Content Removal Policies Github Private Information Removal Policy (GitHub)

OLOpen Legal LibraryUpdated 12 Aug 2026

The GitHub Private Information Removal Policy provides a process for removing high-risk confidential content—such as credentials, tokens, or sensitive diagrams—that poses security threats if exposed in repositories. It is an official GitHub policy, designed to protect users while maintaining platform integrity, and can be trusted as part of GitHub’s broader site governance framework.

[company name] Private Information Removal Policy

We offer this private information removal process as an exceptional service only for high-risk content that violates [company name]'s Terms of Service, such as when your security is at risk from exposed access credentials. This guide describes the information [company name] needs from you in order to process a request to remove private information from a repository.

What is Private Information?

For the purposes of this document, “private information” refers to content that (i) should have been kept confidential, and (ii) whose public availability poses a specific or targeted security risk to you or your organization.

"Security risk" refers to a situation involving exposure to physical danger, identity theft, or increased likelihood of unauthorized access to physical or network facilities.

Private information removal requests are appropriate for:

Access credentials, such as user names combined with passwords, access tokens, or other sensitive secrets that can grant access to your organization's server, network, or domain.

AWS tokens and other similar access credentials that grant access to a third party on your behalf. You must be able to show that the token does belong to you.

Documentation (such as network diagrams or architecture) that poses a specific security risk for an organization.

Information related to, and posing a security risk to, you as an individual (such as social security numbers or other government identification numbers).

Private information removal requests are not appropriate for:

Internal server names, IP addresses, and URLs, on their own. You must be able to show that their use in a particular file or piece of code poses a security threat.

Mere mentions of your company's identity, name, brand, domain name, or other references to your company in files on [company name]. You must be able to articulate why a use of your company's identity is a threat to your company's security posture.

Entire files or repositories that do not pose a specific security risk, but you believe are otherwise objectionable.

Requests to remove content that may infringe your or your organization's copyright rights. If you have questions about how [company name] handles copyright-related matters or would like to report potentially infringing content, please review our DMCA Takedown Policy. The private information removal process is generally not intended for the removal of full files or repositories — only for the specific pieces of private information in those files. While there may be cases where files are filled entirely with private information, you must justify the security risk for the removal of such files, and this may increase the time required to process your request.

Trademark disputes. If you have questions about how [company name] handles trademark-related matters or would like to report content containing your organization's trade or service marks, please review our Trademark Policy [trademark policy link].

Privacy complaints. If you wish to access, transfer, change, or delete your personal information on [company name], please contact us via our Privacy contact form.

Content governed by our Community Guidelines, such as malware or general-purpose tools. If you have questions about our Community Guidelines or believe that content on [company name] might violate our guidelines, you can contact us through the [contact support portal link] to report content.

Things to Know

Ask Nicely First. A great first step before sending us a request to remove data is to try contacting the user directly. They may have listed contact information on their public profile page or in the repository's README or Support file, or you could get in touch by creating an issue or pull request in the repository. This is not strictly required, but it is appreciated.

No Bots. You should have a trained professional evaluate the facts of every request you send. If you're outsourcing your efforts to a third party, make sure you know how they operate, and make sure they are not using automated bots to submit complaints in bulk. These complaints often include data that does not pose any security threats, and they do not include sufficient explanations, requiring additional back-and-forth and resulting in delays, even when the complaint is valid.

Send In The Correct Request. As noted above, we offer this private information removal process as an exceptional service only for high-risk content. We are not able to use this process to remove other kinds of content, such as potentially infringing content, and we are not able to process any other kinds of removal requests simultaneously while processing private information removal requests. We will be able to help you more quickly if you send in your private information removal requests separately from any requests to remove potentially infringing content. If you are unsure whether your request involves only private information or also involves other legal matters, please consult legal counsel.

Processing Time. While we do process private information removal requests as quickly as possible, due to the volume of requests we process, it may take some time for your request to be reviewed. Additional requests, or multiple requests from additional points of contact, may result in delays.

How Does This Actually Work?

Complainant Investigates. It is up to the requesting party to conduct their own investigation and to provide us with the details we require — most importantly, an explanation of how the data poses a security risk. [company name]is not in a position to search for or make initial determinations about private information on any individual's or organization's behalf.

Complainant Sends a Private Information Removal Request. After conducting an investigation, the complainant prepares and sends a private information removal request to [company name]. If the request is not sufficiently detailed to demonstrate the security risk and for [company name] to locate the data, we will reply and ask for more information.

[company name] Asks User to Make Changes. In most cases, we will contact the user who created the repository and give them an opportunity to delete or modify the private information specified in the request or to dispute the claim.

User Notifies [company name] of Changes. If the user chooses to make the specified changes, they must tell us so within the window of time they've been allowed. If they don't, we will disable the repository. If the user notifies us that they made changes, we will verify that the changes have been made and notify the complainant.

OR

User May Dispute the Request. If a user believes the content in question is not private information subject to this Policy, they may dispute it. If they do, we will generally leave it up to the complainant to contact the user and work things out with them directly, within reason.

Complainant Reviews Changes. If the user makes changes, the complainant must review them. If the changes are insufficient, the complainant must provide [company name] with details explaining why. [company name] may disable the repository or give the user an additional chance to make the changes.

User May Request an Additional Window to Make Changes. If the user missed their opportunity to remove the private information specified in the notice, we may allow them an additional window of approximately 1 business day, upon request, to make those changes. In that event, [company name] will notify the complainant.

What About Forks? (or What's a Fork?)

One of the best features of [company name] is the ability for users to "fork" one another's repositories. What does that mean? In essence, it means that users can make a copy of a project on [company name] into their own repositories. As the license or the law allows, users can then make changes to that fork to either push back to the main project or just keep as their own variation of a project. Each of these copies is a AUTOTITLE of the original repository, which in turn may also be called the "parent" of the fork.

[company name] will not automatically disable forks when disabling a parent repository. This is because forks belong to different users and may have been altered in significant ways. [company name]does not conduct any independent investigation into forks. We expect those sending private information removal requests to conduct that investigation and, if they believe that the forks also contain private information, expressly include forks in their request.

If at the time that you submitted your notice, you identified all existing forks of that repository, we would process a valid claim against all forks in that network at the time we process the notice. We would do this given the likelihood that all newly created forks would contain the same content. In addition, if the reported network that contains the reported content is larger than one hundred (100) repositories and thus would be difficult to review in its entirety, we may consider disabling the entire network if you state in your notice that, based on the representative number of forks you have reviewed, you believe that all or most of the forks contain the content reported in the parent repository.

Sending A Private Information Removal Request

Due to the type of content [company name] hosts (mostly software code) and the way that content is managed, we need complaints to be as specific as possible. In order for us to verify that a user has removed reported private information completely, we need to know exactly where to look.

These guidelines are designed to make the processing of requests to remove private information as straightforward as possible.

Your Request Must Include:

A working, clickable link to each file containing private information. (Note that we're not able to work from search results, examples, or screenshots.)

Specific line numbers within each file containing the private information.

A brief description of how each item you've identified poses a security risk to you or your organization. It is important that you provide an explanation of how the data poses a security risk beyond merely stating that it does.

If you are a third party acting as an agent for an organization facing a security risk, include a statement that you have a legal right to act on behalf of that organization.

OPTIONAL: Let us know if your request is particularly urgent, and why. We respond to all private information removal requests as quickly as possible. However, if this request is especially time-sensitive, such as a very recent credential exposure, please explain why.

How to Submit Your Request

You can submit your request to remove private information via our contact form. Please include a plain-text version of your request in the body of your message. Sending your request in an attachment may result in processing delays.

Disputes

If you received a private information removal request from us, you can dispute it by replying to our email and letting us know — in as much detail as possible — why you think the content in question is not private information subject to this Policy.

5.0 out of 5 on Google

Read reviews

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

United States note

This version is drafted for US law generally. Contract, employment and consumer rules vary by state — for example on non-competes and at-will employment. Tell GitLaw which state applies and it adjusts the draft.

Jurisdiction
United States of America
Source
G
Content Removal Policies Github Private Information Removal Policy (GitHub)
from GitHub
Document info
GitLaw document. Document created on Mon Oct 6th, 2025. Last updated on Wed Aug 12th, 2026.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
Denmark
Privacy Policy (Denmark) by Seedsummit
This internal data protection policy establishes how a company manages personal information in compliance with the EU General Data Protection Regulation. It defines processing principles such as data minimization and storage limitation, and outlines the responsibilities of a designated IT systems administrator in Denmark.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
VPN Privacy Notice by Mozilla
This privacy notice explains how a VPN service handles user data, encryption, and third-party sharing. It details the collection of account info, approximate location via IP address, and limited billing details from providers like Stripe or Apple.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Security Policies Github Sirt Description Rfc 2350 (GitHub)
This document provides a standardized description of a Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) following the RFC 2350 protocol. It details contact methods, the team's mission and authority, and specific procedures for handling security incidents.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Content Removal Policies Github Trademark Policy (GitHub)
This policy outlines how a platform manages trademark disputes and reports of unauthorized brand use. It defines what constitutes a violation, provides an reporting procedure for rights holders, and specifies the information required to investigate infringement claims.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
England & Wales
Firefox Focus and Firefox Klar Privacy Notice by Mozilla
This privacy notice explains how a browser developer processes technical, interaction, and browsing data. It details user rights under data protection laws and provides options for managing data collection and search preferences.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Security Policies Coordinated Disclosure Of Security Vulnerabilities (GitHub)
This policy establishes a framework for security researchers to find and report vulnerabilities in a company's software. It introduces a bug bounty program that offers financial rewards for coordinated disclosure and provides links to specific legal safe harbor terms.
Updated 13 Aug 2026

Frequently asked questions

A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.

Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.

Yes, read about team plans here.

Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.

Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.

Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.

It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.

Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.

Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.

Trusted by thousands of businesses

“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”

MH

Michael Hawkes

Read more on Google

“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”

PM

Priyanka Mandal

Read more on Google

“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”

CE

Craig Edmunds

Read more on Google

“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”

BB

Bojana Banjac

Read more on Google

“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”

KL

Kristijan Lazic

Read more on Google

“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”

AM

Andjela Milovanovic

Read more on Google

“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”

RD

Romana Dražić

Read more on Google

“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”

“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”

MK

Marc Kimmel

Read more on Google

“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”

GG

Greg Gretsch

Managing Director

“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”

AB

Aleksandar Blazhev

Entrepreneur

“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”

MH

Michael Hawkes

Read more on Google

“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”

PM

Priyanka Mandal

Read more on Google

“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”

CE

Craig Edmunds

Read more on Google

“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”

BB

Bojana Banjac

Read more on Google

“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”

KL

Kristijan Lazic

Read more on Google

“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”

AM

Andjela Milovanovic

Read more on Google

“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”

RD

Romana Dražić

Read more on Google

“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”

“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”

MK

Marc Kimmel

Read more on Google

“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”

GG

Greg Gretsch

Managing Director

“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”

AB

Aleksandar Blazhev

Entrepreneur

“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”

MA

Maryia Alenina

Read more on Google

“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”

NM

Nishant Mandal

Read more on Google

“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”

AR

Aleksandra Radin

Read more on Google

“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”

“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”

AV

Anisija Vrućinić

Read more on Google

“I love it!!”

JD

Jelena Drazic

Read more on Google

“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”

TG

Tejas Gupta

Read more on Google

“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”

TD

Thomas Daly

Read more on Google

“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”

AC

Alex Cole

Founder, TIN Ventures

“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”

MB

Mrinal Bhatt

HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo

“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”

CH

Chris Hicken

Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid

“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”

MA

Maryia Alenina

Read more on Google

“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”

NM

Nishant Mandal

Read more on Google

“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”

AR

Aleksandra Radin

Read more on Google

“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”

“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”

AV

Anisija Vrućinić

Read more on Google

“I love it!!”

JD

Jelena Drazic

Read more on Google

“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”

TG

Tejas Gupta

Read more on Google

“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”

TD

Thomas Daly

Read more on Google

“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”

AC

Alex Cole

Founder, TIN Ventures

“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”

MB

Mrinal Bhatt

HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo

“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”

CH

Chris Hicken

Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid

From template to signed, in one place

Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.

1

Open

Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.

Free to open

2

Edit with AI

Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.

Tracked changes you can review

3

Send and sign

Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.

eSign included

Built for your legal work, with practicing lawyers

Trained on 5.5K+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.

Portrait headshots of the independent lawyers on the GitLaw standards committee

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

Start free

No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.

GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.