Quashing of Multiple FIRs and Transfer of Investigation to the CBI (India)

Open Legal LibraryUpdated 24 Jul 2026

This document outlines the legal principles and precedents regarding the quashing of multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) and the transfer of investigations to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in India. It focuses on protecting fundamental rights like free speech and preventing the abuse of the legal process through repetitive complaints for the same incident.

QUASHING OF MULTIPLE FIRS AND TRANSFER OF INVESTIGATION TO CBI

Multiple FIRs - Quashing of - Governing principles. Held, where two or more FIRs relate to same incident or relate to incidents which form part of same transactions, subsequent FIRs are liable to be quashed. There can be no second FIR where information concerns the same cognisable offence alleged in the first FIR or the same occurrence or incident which gives rise to one or more cognisable offences. This is because investigation covers not only alleged cognisable offence but also other connected offences. But subsequent FIR relating to different incidents or crimes is maintainable. Filing of a second complaint in regard to same incident as a counter complaint is also not precluded nor is this course of action prohibited by CrPC. TT Antony’s case, referred. (Paras 28-30.1)


Multiple FIRs – Quashing of – A programme telecasted on R Bharat on 21.4.2020 by petitioner (journalist) became the foundation of the allegation of commission of offences under the provisions of Sections 153, 153A, 153B, 295A, 298, 500, 504 and 506 IPC - On basis of this cause of action, several FIRs and criminal complaints lodged against him in different States and UT of J & K - Whether multiple FIRs need to be quashed. Held, yes. Except main FIR [FIR 238 of 2020 dated 22.4.2020] all other FIRs need to be quashed. This is because all FIRs or complaints arose out of one and the same incident and had same cause of action. Complaints were worded in identical terms. Even language, content and sequencing of paragraphs and their numbering were identical. Therefore subsequent FIRs were an abuse of process of law and are quashed. (Para 31)



Ed. : Quashing of those FIRs would not amount to expression of any opinion by Supreme Court on merits of the main FIR.

Constitution of India, 1950

This is a preview. The full template is free on GitLaw.

5.0 out of 5 on Google

Read reviews

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu
Jurisdiction
India
Document info
MS Word. Document created on Fri Jul 24th, 2026. Last updated on Fri Jul 24th, 2026.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
India
Application under Section 439 CrPC for Grant of Bail (India).docx
This document is a formal legal application filed in an Indian court to request the release of an accused person on bail. It is drafted under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, primarily used for bail applications before a High Court or a Sessions Court.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Notice to Admit Facts or Documents (Order 12 Rules 2 and 3 CPC) (India).docx
This template is used by a party in an Indian civil proceeding to request that the opposing party admit the truth of specific facts or the authenticity of particular documents. It streamlines litigation by narrowing the issues in dispute before the trial begins.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Affidavit for Substitution of Karta (India).docx
This affidavit formalises the request to substitute the Karta (manager) of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). It is used following the death of a previous Karta to record the succession of the eldest male member as the new head of the HUF.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Application under Section 438 CrPC for Grant of Bail (India).docx
This template provides the structure for a bail application to be filed before a Court of Session or High Court in India. It enables an individual anticipating arrest for a non-bailable offence to seek protection through the criminal justice system.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Affidavit in a Recovery Suit (India).docx
This template is an Affidavit for a Recovery Suit in India, used by a plaintiff to verify the facts and documents supporting a claim for the recovery of money or property. It includes formal declarations on oath regarding the truth of the lawsuit's contents.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Affidavit for an Interlocutory Application Seeking Security (Rule 3) (India).docx
This affidavit is used in Indian courts to support an interlocutory application for security for costs. It provides the sworn testimony of a deponent to justify why a defendant requires protection against potential legal expenses during litigation.
Updated 13 Aug 2026

Frequently asked questions

A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.

Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.

Yes, read about team plans here.

Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.

Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.

Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.

It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.

Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.

Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.

Trusted by 5,000+ businesses

Nexus logoMlabs logoTechstars logo

From template to signed, in one place

Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.

1

Open

Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.

Free to open

2

Edit with AI

Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.

Tracked changes you can review

3

Send and sign

Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.

eSign included

Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers

Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

Ready to get started?

No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.

GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.