Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
Response to Request for Arbitration (LCIA Rules) by OLL
Open Legal LibraryUpdated 11 Aug 2026
This template provides a structured format for a respondent to file a formal response to a Request for Arbitration under the LCIA (London Court of International Arbitration) Rules. It includes sections for addressing jurisdiction, the factual nature of the dispute, arbitrator nominations, and any potential counterclaims or cross-claims.
This document comes from OLL's library of vetted legal templates.
ARBITRATION NO. [insert case number as provided by the registrar of the lcia court]
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER ARBITRATION RULES OF LONDON COURT OF
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
BETWEEN:
[name of claimant]
(CLAIMANT)
-AND-
[name of respondent]
(RESPONDENT)
RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION
[respondent’s legal representative’s law firm]
[respondent’s legal representatives’ postal address]
[respondent’s legal representatives’ telephone number]
[respondent’s legal representatives’ facsimile number]
[respondent’s legal representatives’ e-mail]
Legal Representative for Respondent [date of the response]
I. INTRODUCTION
This Response to Claimant’s Request for Arbitration (hereinafter the “Response”), OPTIONAL: together with its Exhibits numbered R-1 to R-[•], is submitted on behalf of [name of respondent] (hereinafter “Respondent”) pursuant to Article 2 of Arbitration Rules of London Court of International Arbitration in force as from 1 October 2014 (the “LCIA Rules”).
In this Response, unless otherwise stated, Respondent adopts the abbreviations used in Claimant’s Request for Arbitration.
Unless otherwise stated, capitalised terms shall have the meanings given to them in the Request.
Unless expressly admitted, each paragraph of the Request and all of the claims advanced by the Claimant in the Request are denied by Respondent.
Pursuant to Article 2 of LCIA Rules, this Response contains information concerning the following:
i. The name, description and contact information of each of the Parties (II);
ii. Respondent’s comments as to the Arbitral Tribunal’s jurisdiction (III);
iii. Respondent’s position as regards the nature and circumstances of the dispute (IV);
iv. Respondent’s comments concerning the composition of the Arbitral Tribunal (V);
v. Respondent’s comments as to the place of arbitration, the applicable rules of law and the language(s) of the arbitration (VI);
vi. Respondent’s counterclaims and/or cross claims (VII);
vii. Relief sought (VIII); and
viii. Confirmation of the delivery of the Response to all other parties (IX)
II. THE PARTIES
A. Respondent
Respondent is [Name of respondent], a company registered under the laws of [Name of country or jurisdiction], with its registered office located at [Complete postal address].
Insert brief description of Respondent’s business activity, industry sector, size of business, number of employees, market position, revenue, etc., as relevant.
Respondent’s postal address is:
[Respondent’s name]
[Respondent’s postal address in full]
[Attention: name of Respondent’s director]
[Respondent’s telephone number]
[Respondent’s facsimile number]
[Respondent’s e-mail]
Respondent’s legal representatives, to whom all correspondence should be sent in this arbitration, are:
NOTE: Article 2.1(i) LCIA Rules
[respondent’s legal representatives’ law firm]
[Name of the partner in charge of representing Respondent]
[Names of other lawyers]
[Respondent’s legal representatives’ postal address]
[Respondent’s legal representatives’ telephone number]
[Respondent’s legal representatives’ facsimile number]
[Respondent’s legal representatives’ e-mail]
B. Claimant
Claimant is [Name of Claimant], a company registered under the laws of [Name of country or jurisdiction], with its registered office located at [Complete postal address].
This is a preview. The full template is free on GitLaw.
5.0 out of 5 on Google
Read reviewsAs seen in
About this template
What is this template?
This is a formal legal filing used by a respondent to participate in a London Court of International Arbitration proceeding. It is not a contract, but a procedural document that identifies the parties, their legal representatives, and their initial stance on the dispute. It specifically contains sections for challenging jurisdiction and nominating arbitrators under Article 2 of the LCIA Rules.
When should you use it?
Use this template when you have been served with a Request for Arbitration and need to file a formal response within the timeframe required by the LCIA Rules. Use an LCIA Request for Arbitration instead if you are the party initiating the claim.
What's inside
| Clause | Name | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Section III | Comments on Jurisdiction | Allows the Respondent to argue that the Arbitral Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to hear the dispute or specific complaints. |
| Section V | Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal | Provides for the Respondent to nominate a Co-Arbitrator or Sole Arbitrator and contest nominations made by the Claimant. |
| Section VI | Procedural Comments | Records the Respondent's position on the arbitral seat, governing law, and the language of the arbitration proceedings. |
| Section VII | Defence and Counterclaims | Enables the Respondent to set out its factual background, legal defences, and preliminary estimates of losses for counterclaims. |
| Section VIII | Relief Sought | Specifies the formal requests for the Tribunal to dismiss claims, award damages, or order payment of arbitration costs. |
| Section IX | Confirmation of Delivery | Confirms delivery of the Response to all other parties pursuant to Article 2.1(vi) of the LCIA Rules. |
Who it's for
- a company responding to an LCIA arbitration request while contesting the tribunal's jurisdiction
- legal representatives drafting a formal response and counterclaim under the 2014 LCIA Rules
- a party seeking to nominate an arbitrator in response to an existing arbitration filing
How long it runs and how it's signed
How long
Used once
Signed by
Respondent's legal representative
Witness
Not required
Notarisation
Not required
Also needed
file multiple copies with the LCIA Registrar; provide documentary proof of actual delivery
Law it's drafted under
Governed by
Arbitration Rules of London Court of International Arbitration
Governed by
LCIA Rules
England & Wales note
This version is drafted for England & Wales. Scotland and Northern Ireland differ on some points — for example notice periods and tribunal procedure. Tell GitLaw where you hire and it adjusts the draft.
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates)
General
Document info
GitLaw document. Document created on Wed Aug 5th, 2026. Last updated on Tue Aug 11th, 2026.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 (Attribution-ShareAlike).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
FeaturedUnited Nations
Response to Notice of Arbitration (UNCITRAL Rules) by OLL
This formal response template allows a respondent to answer a Notice of Arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules. It provides structured sections for contesting jurisdiction, commenting on arbitrator nominations, and asserting counterclaims for damages.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Singapore
Statement of Counterclaim (Pleading) (SIAC Rules) by OLL
This template provides a formal structure for a Statement of Counterclaim under the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition). It is used in international arbitration when a respondent files a standalone claim against the claimant rather than merging it with the Statement of Defence.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Request for Arbitration (LCIA Rules) by OLL
This document is a formal request to initiate arbitration under the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) rules. It enables a claimant to define the dispute, nominate arbitrators, and state the specific financial relief and legal declarations sought from the tribunal. The template includes required sections for party details, the factual background of the breach, and proof of registration fee payment.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
United Nations
Statement of Claim (Memorial) (UNCITRAL Rules) by OLL
This template is a formal response for a respondent in an international arbitration governed by the 2021 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. It provides a structured framework for submitting a Statement of Defence, including factual backgrounds, legal grounds, and optional counterclaims.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
General
Landscaping Contract by EasyLegalDocs
This landscaping services agreement establishes the terms for garden maintenance, design, and installation work at a client's property. It covers recurring service schedules, payment terms, and technical requirements for project modifications.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Frequently asked questions
A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.
Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.
Yes, read about team plans here.
Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.
Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.
Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.
It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.
Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.
Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.
Trusted by 5,000+ businesses
From template to signed, in one place
Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.
1
Open
Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.
Free to open
2
Edit with AI
Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.
Tracked changes you can review
3
Send and sign
Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.
eSign included
Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers
Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.
Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
Juliana Calil
Principal Counsel · Technology & Entertainment
20+ years in-house at Google, Intel, Disney and Looker
Adam Wardel
General Counsel, Data Privacy Officer & AI Advisor
12+ years leading legal & privacy for SaaS and AI companies
John Hoffman
Associate Director, Corporate Counsel · Life Sciences & Technology
20+ years in corporate counsel, incl. senior counsel at Certara
Richard Nohe
General Counsel · Telecom, Cloud & Data Centers
20+ years in-house, regional General Counsel at BT across 30+ countries
Joe Al-Khayat
General Counsel · Technology & High-Growth Companies
Cross-jurisdictional M&A and SaaS contracting across the UK, US & Australia
Joshua Woo
Technology, AI & Privacy Counsel · APAC
Former Goldman Sachs Executive Director for AI, cybersecurity & privacy in APAC
Sahil Verma
International Business & Investment Lawyer
13+ years in business law, investment law & dispute resolution
Matthew Willis
CRO & General Counsel · SaaS
Former President of the ACC's 2,200-attorney Chicago Chapter · JD + Kellogg MBA
Mayowa Ogunrinola
Legal Consultant · Fintech & AI Compliance
Regulatory strategy, AI governance & data protection for fintech and AI
Steven J. Shanker
Partner and Chair of Corporate and Employment Law
25+ years as a corporate & employment attorney in New York
Rebecca Babbage
Legal Counsel · Financial Services, Corporate & Governance
UK-qualified solicitor working in-house with regulated entities in financial services
As seen in
Ready to get started?
No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.
GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.