Bail Application under Section 437 CrPC (India)

OLOpen Legal LibraryUpdated 24 Jul 2026

This template provides several standardized forms for Indian legal proceedings, including a bail application under Section 437 of the CrPC, a civil revision petition, and a memorandum of appeal. It includes guidance on drafting grounds for appeal and necessary verification structures for court submissions.

Bail Application under Section 437, Cr.P.C. 1973

In the Court of............... Magistrate ......

The State ...................

Versus

Accused AB son of TZ,

Village: .............

Thana: .........

In the matter of petition for bail of accused AB, during police enquiry

The humble petition of AB the accused above-named Most respectfully sheweth:

1. That your petitioner was arrested by the police on 5th March 2013 on mere suspicion. That nearly a month has passed after the arrest but still the Investigating Police Officer has not submitted a chargesheet.

2. That your petitioner was not identified by any inmate of the house of CM where the burglary is alleged to have taken place, nor was any incriminating article found in his house.

3. That your petitioner has reason to believe that one GS with whom your petitioner is on bad terms and who is looking after the case for complainant has falsely implicated your petitioner in the case out of grudge.

4. That your petitioner shall fully co-operate with the police.

5. That your petitioner is not likely to abscond or leave the country. Your petitioner prays that your Honour may be pleased to call for police papers and after perusing the same be pleased to direct the release of your petitioner on bail. And your petitioner, as in duty bound, shall ever pray. Advocate AB

Verification

I, AB, son of TZ, residing at................

by occupation business, do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows:

1. I am the petitioner above-named. I know and I have made myself acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case and I am able to depose thereto.

2. The statements in paragraphs 1 to 5 of the foregoing petition are true and correct to my knowledge and belief.

3. I sign this verification on the 6th day of May 2013. Solemnly affirmed by the said AB on 6th May 2013 at the Court House at.........................

AB Before me Notary/Magistrate.

SPECIMEN FORM OF REVISION

In the High Court of……………………

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

Civil Revision No…………………… of 2018

IN THE MATTER OF:

ABC S/o…………….....

R/o………………………………………… Petitioner

Versus XYZ S/o........................

.R/o…………………………………………… Respondent

AND

IN THE MATTER OF: CIVIL REVISION AGAINST THE ORDER DATED……………………

PASSED BY THE LEARNED SUB-JUDGE, IST CLASS…………………… IN THE SUIT ENTITLED ABC -VS.- XYZ (CIVIL SUIT NO. …………………… OF 2013) May it please the Hon’ble Chief Justice, High Court of…………………… and his companion Justices. The petitioner most respectfully showeth:

A. That the petitioner named above has filed a suit against the respondents for the recovery of possession of a house situated in……………………, fully described in the plaint. The suit is pending in the court of Sub-Judge Ist Class…………………… and the next date of hearing is……………………

B. That on being summoned the respondent appeared before the court below and filed his written statement wherein he denied the petitioner’s title set up in the suit property.

C. That the trial court framed issues on……………… and directed the petitioner (plaintiff) to produce evidence, upon which the petitioner promptly furnished to the court below a list of witnesses and also deposited their diet expenses etc., making a request that the witness be summoned by that Court.

D. That on a previous date of hearing that is……………………, 2013, two witness of the petitioner had appeared and their statements were recorded. However, the learned Presiding Officer of the court below passed an order that the remaining witnesses be produced by the petitioner-plaintiff on his own without seeking the assistance of the court. This order was passed despite a request by the petitioner that at least those witness named in the list who are State employees should be summoned by the court, as they are required to produce and prove some official records.

E. That on the next date of hearing the learned trial court by the order impugned in this revision closed the evidence of the petitioner-plaintiff on the ground that the remaining witnesses were not produced by him.

F. That the impugned order has caused great prejudice to the petitioner and if the same is allowed to stand the petitioner’s suit is bound to fail.

G. That the trial court has unjustifiably denied assistance of the court to the petitioner-plaintiff to secure the attendance of his witnesses. The interests of justice demand that he is provided with all legal assistance in this regard. In the facts and circumstances discussed above the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside the order under revision and direct the court below to provide assistance of the court for summoning the plaintiff-witnesses.

PETITIONER

[Affidavit to be filed in support of the fact that the contents of the accompanying revision petition are true and correct to the best of the deponent’s knowledge and that nothing has been kept back or concealed].

Drafting of Appeals An appeal may be divided into three parts:

(1) formal part, known as the memorandum of appeal,

(2) material part, grounds of appeal, and

(3) relief sought for. The memorandum of appeal should begin with the name of the Court in which it is filed. After the name of the Court, number of the appeal and the year in which it is filed are given. As the number is noted by the officials of the Court, a blank space is left for it. Then follow the names and addresses of the parties to the appeal. The name of the appellant is given first and then that of the respondent. It should be indicated against the names of the parties as to what character each party had in the lower Court, i.e. whether he was a plaintiff or a defendant, or an applicant or an opposite party, as:

A.B., son of etc. (Plaintiff) Appellant

Versus

C.D., son of etc. (Defendant) Respondent

Or A.B., son of etc. (Decree-holder) Appellant

Versus

C.D., son of etc. (Judgement-debtor) Respondent

After the names of the parties, an introductory statement giving the particulars of the decree or order appealed from (viz., the number and date, the court which passed it, and the name of the presiding officer), should be written in some such form as: “The above-named appellant appeals to the Court of…………………… from the decree of………………

Civil Judge at…………………

in Suit No…………………… passed on the…………………… and sets forth the following grounds of objections to the decree appealed from, namely”. This may also be written in the form of a heading as: “Appeal from the decree of……………………

Civil Judge of…………………… at……………………

in Suit No…………………… passed on the……………………”.

Thereafter, the grounds of appeal be given under the heading

“Grounds of Appeal”.

The grounds of appeal are the grounds on which the decree or the order appealed from is objected to or attacked. As a general rule, in the grounds of appeal, the following points may be raised:

(a) any mistake committed by the lower Court in weighing the evidence;

(b) any mistake in the view of law entertained by the lower Court;

(c) any misapplication of law to the facts of the case;

(d) any material irregularity committed in the trial of the case;

(e) any substantial error or defect or procedure;

(f) and the defect, error or irregularity of any inter-locutory order passed in the case, whether the same was appealable or not. A ground taken but not pressed in the first Appellate Court cannot be revived in second appeal. A defendant can question the propriety of ex parte proceedings in an appeal from the decree. The general rule, besides being subject to Section 100 of the Code, is also subject to two conditions:

(1) that the mistake of the lower Court should be material i.e., it should be such as affects the decision, and

(2) that the objection taken must be such as arises from the pleadings and evidence in the lower Court.

Drafting Grounds of Appeals

Grounds of objection should be written distinctly and specifically;

They should be written concisely;

They must not be framed in a narrative or argumentative form; and

Each distinct objection should be stated in a separate ground and the grounds should be numbered consecutively. These rules are simple but are most important and must be carefully remembered and observed while drafting Grounds of Appeal. Relief Sought in Appeal It is nowhere expressly provided in the Code that the relief sought in appeal should be stated in the memorandum of appeal. The absence of prayer for relief in appeal does not appear to be fatal and the Court is bound to exercise its powers under Section 107 of the Code and to give to the appellant such relief as it thinks proper. However, it is an established practice to mention in the memorandum of appeal, the relief sought by the appellant.

Signature A memorandum of appeal need not be signed by the appellant himself. It may be signed by him or by his counsel but if there are several appellants and they have no counsel, it must be signed by all of them. It is not required to be verified.

Specimen Form of Appeal to the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF…………………… AT……………………

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL NO…………………… OF

IN THE MATTER OF:

A.B.C. Company Ltd. a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act and having its registered office…………………… Appellant

Versus

M/s…………………… a partnership concern (or XYZ company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act and having its registered office at……………………)… Respondents

May it please the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the High Court of…………………… and his Lordship’s Companion Justices,

The appellant-company MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the appellant herein is a company duly registered under the provisions of the Companies Act and the registered office of the appellant is at…………………… and the company is engaged in the business of manufacturing……………………

2. That the respondents who are also doing business of selling goods manufactured by the appellantsand other manufacturers approached the appellant for purchasing from the appellant-company the aforesaid manufactured goods. An agreement was reached between the parties which were reducing into writing. The appellant supplied goods worth Rs. 15 lacs over a period of …………………… months to the respondents. A statement of account regarding the goods so supplied is annexed hereto and marked as ANNEXURE A-1.

3. That the respondents have made a total payment of Rs. 6 lacs on different dates. The statement of the said payments made by the respondents is appended and is marked as ANNEXURE A-2.

4. That the remaining amount has not been paid by the respondent despite repeated demands and issuance of a legal notice by the appellant through advocate.

5. That the appellant filed a suit for recovery of the aforesaid balance amount of Rs. 9 lacs together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum and the cost of the suit. The suit was filed on…………………… in the court of the learned District Judge.

6. That upon being summoned by the said court the respondents appeared through counsel and filed their written statement to which appellant-plaintiff also filed replication (rejoinder).

7. That the parties led evidence. After hearing the counsel for the parties the learned District Judge has by his judgement and decree passed on…………………… dismissed the appellant’s suit on the ground that the evidence led by the parties does not establish the claim of the appellant-plaintiff. Copies of the judgement and decree of the court below are annexed hereto and are marked as ANNEXURE A-3 AND A-4, respectively. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgement and decree of the court below dismissing the suit of the plaintiff, this appeal is hereby filed on the following, amongst other,

GROUNDS

A. That the judgement and decree under appeal are erroneous both on facts as well as law.

B. That the learned trial court has failed to properly appreciate the evidence, and has fallen into error in not finding that the preponderance of probability was in favour of the plaintiff-appellant.

C. That there was sufficient evidence led by the plaintiff to prove the issues raised in the suit and the defendant-respondent has failed to effectively rebut the plaintiff’s evidence, more particularly the documentary evidence.

D. …………………… E. …………………… F. ……………………

8. That the valuation of this appeal for the purposes of payment of court-fee is fixed at ₹…………………… and the requisite court fee in the form of stamps is appended to this memorandum of appeal.

9. That this appeal is being filed within the prescribed period of limitation, the judgement and decree under appeal having been passed on………………… In the above facts and circumstances the appellant prays that this appeal be allowed, the judgement and decree under appeal be set aside and the decree prayed for by the appellant in his suit before the court below be passed together with up-to-date interest and costs of both courts.

APPELLANT (……………………)

5.0 out of 5 on Google

Read reviews

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu
Jurisdiction
India
Document info
MS Word. Document created on Fri Jul 24th, 2026. Last updated on Fri Jul 24th, 2026.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
India
Application under Section 439 CrPC for Grant of Bail (India).docx
This document is a formal legal application filed in an Indian court to request the release of an accused person on bail. It is drafted under **Section 439** of the Code of Criminal Procedure, primarily used for bail applications before a High Court or a Sessions Court.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Notice to Admit Facts or Documents (Order 12 Rules 2 and 3 CPC) (India).docx
This template is used by a party in an Indian civil proceeding to request that the opposing party admit the truth of specific facts or the authenticity of particular documents. It streamlines litigation by narrowing the issues in dispute before the trial begins.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Affidavit for Substitution of Karta (India).docx
This affidavit formalises the request to substitute the **Karta** (manager) of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). It is used following the death of a previous Karta to record the succession of the eldest male member as the new head of the HUF.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Application under Section 438 CrPC for Grant of Bail (India).docx
This template provides the structure for a **bail application** to be filed before a Court of Session or High Court in India. It enables an individual anticipating arrest for a non-bailable offence to seek protection through the criminal justice system.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Affidavit in a Recovery Suit (India).docx
This template is an **Affidavit for a Recovery Suit** in India, used by a plaintiff to verify the facts and documents supporting a claim for the recovery of money or property. It includes formal declarations on oath regarding the truth of the lawsuit's contents.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Affidavit for an Interlocutory Application Seeking Security (Rule 3) (India).docx
This affidavit is used in Indian courts to support an interlocutory application for security for costs. It provides the sworn testimony of a deponent to justify why a defendant requires protection against potential legal expenses during litigation.
Updated 13 Aug 2026

Frequently asked questions

A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.

Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.

Yes, read about team plans here.

Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.

Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.

Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.

It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.

Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.

Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.

Trusted by thousands of businesses

“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”

MH

Michael Hawkes

Read more on Google

“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”

PM

Priyanka Mandal

Read more on Google

“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”

CE

Craig Edmunds

Read more on Google

“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”

BB

Bojana Banjac

Read more on Google

“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”

KL

Kristijan Lazic

Read more on Google

“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”

AM

Andjela Milovanovic

Read more on Google

“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”

RD

Romana Dražić

Read more on Google

“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”

“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”

MK

Marc Kimmel

Read more on Google

“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”

GG

Greg Gretsch

Managing Director

“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”

AB

Aleksandar Blazhev

Entrepreneur

“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”

MH

Michael Hawkes

Read more on Google

“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”

PM

Priyanka Mandal

Read more on Google

“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”

CE

Craig Edmunds

Read more on Google

“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”

BB

Bojana Banjac

Read more on Google

“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”

KL

Kristijan Lazic

Read more on Google

“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”

AM

Andjela Milovanovic

Read more on Google

“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”

RD

Romana Dražić

Read more on Google

“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”

“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”

MK

Marc Kimmel

Read more on Google

“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”

GG

Greg Gretsch

Managing Director

“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”

AB

Aleksandar Blazhev

Entrepreneur

“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”

MA

Maryia Alenina

Read more on Google

“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”

NM

Nishant Mandal

Read more on Google

“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”

AR

Aleksandra Radin

Read more on Google

“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”

“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”

AV

Anisija Vrućinić

Read more on Google

“I love it!!”

JD

Jelena Drazic

Read more on Google

“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”

TG

Tejas Gupta

Read more on Google

“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”

TD

Thomas Daly

Read more on Google

“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”

AC

Alex Cole

Founder, TIN Ventures

“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”

MB

Mrinal Bhatt

HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo

“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”

CH

Chris Hicken

Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid

“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”

MA

Maryia Alenina

Read more on Google

“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”

NM

Nishant Mandal

Read more on Google

“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”

AR

Aleksandra Radin

Read more on Google

“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”

“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”

AV

Anisija Vrućinić

Read more on Google

“I love it!!”

JD

Jelena Drazic

Read more on Google

“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”

TG

Tejas Gupta

Read more on Google

“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”

TD

Thomas Daly

Read more on Google

“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”

AC

Alex Cole

Founder, TIN Ventures

“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”

MB

Mrinal Bhatt

HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo

“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”

CH

Chris Hicken

Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid

From template to signed, in one place

Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.

1

Open

Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.

Free to open

2

Edit with AI

Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.

Tracked changes you can review

3

Send and sign

Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.

eSign included

Built for your legal work, with practicing lawyers

Trained on 5.5K+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.

Portrait headshots of the independent lawyers on the GitLaw standards committee

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

Start free

No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.

GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.