Acceptable Use Policies Github Appeal And Reinstatement (GitHub)

GGitHubUpdated 17 Oct 2025

This document outlines GitHub's internal process for users to appeal moderation decisions or request reinstatement of their accounts or content. Users can submit a request if they believe a violation decision was mistaken or if they are willing to rectify a violation to regain access. It details the steps involved and mentions potential additional legal rights for users in certain jurisdictions like the European Union.

GitHub Appeal and Reinstatement

While the majority of interactions between individuals in GitHub’s community fall within our Acceptable Use Policies and Community Guidelines, violations of those policies do occur at times. When they do, GitHub staff may need to take enforcement action to address the violations. However, we understand that sometimes we might make mistakes. In some cases there may be a basis to reverse a moderation action taken (or not taken) by GitHub Staff. To ensure our policies and outcomes are applied evenly, GitHub provides an internal complaint-handling process where users can submit requests for reinstatement or provide additional information to appeal a moderation decision.

What are Appeals and Reinstatements?

Both Appeals and Reinstatements may arise in relation to decisions to disable or limit access to content or an account, including decisions whether or not to:

Remove, disable access to, or restrict visibility of content

Suspend or terminate access to an account

Suspend or terminate access to the service, in whole or in part

Suspend, terminate or otherwise restrict the ability to monetize content

A “Reinstatement” is where a user wishes to regain access to their account or content and is willing to make any necessary changes to address the violation and agrees not to violate our terms going forward.

An “Appeal” is where a user disputes that a violation has occurred and can provide additional information to show that a different decision should have been reached.

How this works

If you seek Reinstatement or wish to Appeal an enforcement action, please fill out our Appeal and Reinstatement form. You may Appeal a moderation decision for up to six months following the decision. GitHub may, in its discretion, refuse to consider any Appeals submitted more than six months after the decision.

GitHub staff will review the information provided in the form to determine whether there is sufficient information to warrant Reinstatement or granting of an Appeal.

Reinstatements

Where a user can agree to abide by our Acceptable Use Policies moving forward and has made the changes necessary to address the violation(s), we may choose to reinstate their account or content depending on the circumstances and severity of the initial violation.

All legitimate Reinstatement requests will be reviewed initially by GitHub staff and will be answered with a decision.

Appeals

Where a user seeks to dispute a decision, they can use the form to explain their basis for disputing the decision and to provide any additional information regarding the alleged violation that they believe should have led to a different decision.

If the information provided demonstrates that a different conclusion should have been reached, we may be able to grant an Appeal. GitHub will reverse or modify its decision when the Appeal contains sufficient grounds for us to determine that (i) our decision to act or not to act was mistaken; (ii) that the content or conduct was not illegal and not incompatible with our Terms; or (iii) that the content or conduct warrants a lesser severity of action than the measure taken.

All decisions on Appeal are made by humans and not by any automated means. If the GitHub Staff reviewer on the Appeal is the same person who made the initial determination and that staff member believes their initial conclusion was correct (and thus would be inclined to deny the Appeal), a different member of GitHub’s staff will independently review the Appeal.

All legitimate Appeals will be answered with a final decision.

Transparency

We track Appeals and Reinstatements in our Transparency Center.

Legal Rights

If you believe that a final decision made on Appeal is still incorrect you may, in certain circumstances, have additional rights to seek review of the decision under your local law. For example, if you are located in the European Union, it might be possible to access an out-of-court dispute settlement process under the Digital Services Act. This process reflects GitHub's commitment to internationally recognized human rights set out in the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), privacy, and free expression.

5.0 out of 5 on Google

Read reviews

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu
Jurisdiction
European Union
Document info
HTML document. Document created on Fri Sep 12th, 2025. Last updated on Fri Oct 17th, 2025.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Letter to say you received goods or services you didn't ask for by Citizens Advice
This letter informs a company that you have received goods or services you did not order and treats them as unsolicited under UK law. It gives the sender a deadline to collect the items at their own expense before they are treated as your property.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Content Removal Policies Github Trademark Policy (GitHub)
This policy outlines how a platform manages trademark disputes and reports of unauthorized brand use. It defines what constitutes a violation, provides an reporting procedure for rights holders, and specifies the information required to investigate infringement claims.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Letter to warn trader about court action for faulty goods by Citizens Advice
This letter serves as a formal notice before court action to a trader regarding faulty goods. It demands a full refund under the **Consumer Rights Act 2015** and sets a specific deadline for a response before county court proceedings are initiated.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
European Union
Content Moderation Practices by Mozilla
This document outlines how an organization manages content moderation for user-generated text, images, and software applications. It specifies the human-led review process for reports of illegal or policy-violating content and the subsequent **appeals procedure** for both reporters and account holders.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Notice to Admit Facts or Documents (Order 12 Rules 2 and 3 CPC) (India).docx
This template is used by a party in an Indian civil proceeding to request that the opposing party admit the truth of specific facts or the authenticity of particular documents. It streamlines litigation by narrowing the issues in dispute before the trial begins.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
VPN Privacy Notice by Mozilla
This privacy notice explains how a VPN service handles user data, encryption, and third-party sharing. It details the collection of account info, approximate location via IP address, and limited billing details from providers like Stripe or Apple.
Updated 13 Aug 2026

Frequently asked questions

A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.

Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.

Yes, read about team plans here.

Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.

Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.

Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.

It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.

Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.

Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.

Trusted by thousands of businesses

“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”

MH

Michael Hawkes

Read more on Google

“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”

PM

Priyanka Mandal

Read more on Google

“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”

CE

Craig Edmunds

Read more on Google

“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”

BB

Bojana Banjac

Read more on Google

“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”

KL

Kristijan Lazic

Read more on Google

“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”

AM

Andjela Milovanovic

Read more on Google

“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”

RD

Romana Dražić

Read more on Google

“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”

“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”

MK

Marc Kimmel

Read more on Google

“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”

GG

Greg Gretsch

Managing Director

“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”

AB

Aleksandar Blazhev

Entrepreneur

“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”

MH

Michael Hawkes

Read more on Google

“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”

PM

Priyanka Mandal

Read more on Google

“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”

CE

Craig Edmunds

Read more on Google

“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”

BB

Bojana Banjac

Read more on Google

“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”

KL

Kristijan Lazic

Read more on Google

“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”

AM

Andjela Milovanovic

Read more on Google

“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”

RD

Romana Dražić

Read more on Google

“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”

“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”

MK

Marc Kimmel

Read more on Google

“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”

GG

Greg Gretsch

Managing Director

“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”

AB

Aleksandar Blazhev

Entrepreneur

“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”

MA

Maryia Alenina

Read more on Google

“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”

NM

Nishant Mandal

Read more on Google

“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”

AR

Aleksandra Radin

Read more on Google

“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”

“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”

AV

Anisija Vrućinić

Read more on Google

“I love it!!”

JD

Jelena Drazic

Read more on Google

“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”

TG

Tejas Gupta

Read more on Google

“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”

TD

Thomas Daly

Read more on Google

“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”

AC

Alex Cole

Founder, TIN Ventures

“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”

MB

Mrinal Bhatt

HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo

“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”

CH

Chris Hicken

Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid

“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”

MA

Maryia Alenina

Read more on Google

“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”

NM

Nishant Mandal

Read more on Google

“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”

AR

Aleksandra Radin

Read more on Google

“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”

“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”

AV

Anisija Vrućinić

Read more on Google

“I love it!!”

JD

Jelena Drazic

Read more on Google

“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”

TG

Tejas Gupta

Read more on Google

“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”

TD

Thomas Daly

Read more on Google

“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”

AC

Alex Cole

Founder, TIN Ventures

“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”

MB

Mrinal Bhatt

HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo

“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”

CH

Chris Hicken

Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid

From template to signed, in one place

Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.

1

Open

Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.

Free to open

2

Edit with AI

Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.

Tracked changes you can review

3

Send and sign

Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.

eSign included

Built for your legal work, with practicing lawyers

Trained on 5.5K+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.

Portrait headshots of the independent lawyers on the GitLaw standards committee

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

Start free

No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.

GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.