SIAC Statement of Defence to Counterclaim (Memorial)

OLOpen Legal LibraryUpdated 9 Aug 2026

Filed under Rule 33.4 in reply to the Statement of Counterclaim (merged or standalone). This is also the operative deadline for any jurisdictional objection to the counterclaim specifically (Rule 31.2(a), second limb). Contains a full traverse, paragraph-by-paragraph reply, argued legal grounds, and any set-off/cross-claim pleaded in answer. Choose this form where the counterclaim was memorialised, or where the Claimant needs to argue set-off/cross-claim in full at this stage.

SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition) — Statement of Defence to Counterclaim

Archetype: Memorial

This is the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent's reply to the Respondent's Statement of Counterclaim, submitted under Rule 33.4. This document is structurally a defence responding to the counterclaim's factual allegations, and follows the same general traverse and three-way admission structure as a Statement of Defence, notwithstanding its different title.

This template numbers every paragraph, including optional ones, as though included. Delete any paragraph or clause that does not apply to this filing and renumber sequentially before submission.

Preliminary Matters

This arbitration may proceed under the Streamlined Procedure or the Expedited Procedure. If either applies, confirm the applicable timetable.

Jurisdiction Gate — Counterclaim. Rule 31.2(a) of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition) provides that an objection that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction "with respect to a counterclaim" must be raised no later than in a Statement of Defence to a Counterclaim — the second limb of the jurisdictional-plea cut-off (the first limb, for the main claim, is the Statement of Defence itself). Any objection to the Tribunal's jurisdiction over the Counterclaim specifically must be raised in this document if not already raised.

STATEMENT OF DEFENCE TO COUNTERCLAIM

SIAC Case No.: [Insert case number, if assigned]

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE SIAC RULES (2025, 7th EDITION)

BETWEEN

[Claimant's name] of

[Claimant's address]

("Claimant," "Counterclaim-Respondent")

— and —

[Respondent's name] of

[Respondent's address]

("Respondent," "Counterclaim-Claimant")

Submitted on behalf of the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent by: [Representative's title] [Representative's name]

Date: [Date]

Introduction

This Statement of Defence to Counterclaim is submitted pursuant to Rule 33.4, in reply to the Statement of Counterclaim.

Rule 33.4 requires: (a) a statement of facts supporting the defence; (b) legal grounds or arguments supporting the defence, cross-claim, or set-off; and (c) the relief sought. Section index: (I) Third-Party Funding Disclosure; (II) Jurisdiction (Counterclaim); (III) General Traverse; (IV) Paragraph-by-Paragraph Reply; (V) Rule 33.4(a) — Facts Supporting the Defence; (VI) Rule 33.4(b) — Legal Grounds, Cross-Claim, or Set-Off; (VII) Rule 33.4(c) — Relief Sought.

Third-Party Funding Disclosure

Pursuant to Rule 38.1 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent discloses that no third-party funding agreement exists as at the date of this document.

Where a third-party funding agreement exists, substitute the following for paragraph 3: Pursuant to Rule 38.1 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent discloses the existence of a third-party funding agreement. The identity and contact details of the funder are [funder details].

Jurisdiction (Counterclaim)

No objection is raised to the Tribunal's jurisdiction over the Counterclaim.

Where the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent objects to jurisdiction over the Counterclaim, substitute the following for paragraph 4: The Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent objects to the Tribunal's jurisdiction over the Counterclaim on the following factual and legal basis: [state basis]. This objection is raised within the deadline identified in Section 1 above.

General Traverse

Save as expressly admitted in this document, the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent denies each and every allegation made in the Statement of Counterclaim as if set out here and traversed individually.

Paragraph-by-Paragraph Reply

Use "Not Admitted" for allegations outside the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent's own knowledge, rather than a positive denial.

SoCC ¶

Allegation (summary)

Response

Facts Supporting the Defence

[Insert factual narrative supporting the defence to the counterclaim, cross-referenced to exhibits.]

Rule 33.4(a)

Rule 33.4(b) — Legal Grounds, Cross-Claim, or Set-Off

Legal grounds in answer to the Counterclaim. [State the legal basis, with authorities.]

Include the following paragraph only if the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent pleads set-off or a cross-claim within this document:

Set-Off / Cross-Claim. The Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent pleads set-off/cross-claim in the amount of [amount] against any sum found due on the Counterclaim, pursuant to Rule 33.4(b). This is a separate set-off from any pleaded by the Respondent in its own Statement of Defence.

Relief Sought

The Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent respectfully requests that the Tribunal: (a) DISMISS the Statement of Counterclaim in its entirety, alternatively in part; (b) GIVE EFFECT to the set-off/cross-claim pleaded above in the amount of [amount]; (c) ORDER the Respondent/Counterclaim-Claimant to pay the costs associated with the Counterclaim; and (d) GRANT such further or other relief as the Tribunal considers just.

Delete limb (b) if no set-off or cross-claim is pleaded, and re-letter accordingly.

Rule 33.4(c) —

Annexure Schedule

Pursuant to Rule 33.7 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), this submission shall be accompanied by copies of all supporting documents that have not previously been submitted by any party. The Tribunal may, after considering the views of the parties, further direct that this submission be accompanied by supporting witness statements and expert reports.

Exhibit No.

Description

Referenced at ¶

C-DTC-1

[Document]

¶ [ ]

Signature Block

Respectfully submitted,

[Representative's title] [Representative's name]

On behalf of the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent Date: [Date]

5.0 out of 5 on Google

Read reviews

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu
Jurisdiction
Singapore
General
Document info
GitLaw document. Document created on Sun Aug 9th, 2026. Last updated on Sun Aug 9th, 2026.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Letter to complain to a phone company about cashback by Citizens Advice
The Citizens Advice template letter to complain to a phone company about cashback helps consumers request promised cashback under a phone contract and warns of further action for breach of contract. It is part of Citizens Advice’s widely trusted library of open, lawyer-vetted letter templates.
Updated 3 Nov 2025
US
Arbitration Agreement by EasyLegalDocs
This Arbitration Agreement outlines the terms under which any disputes between the involved parties will be resolved through binding arbitration. It specifies the rules, location, and costs associated with the arbitration process, ensuring a structured approach to dispute resolution.
Updated 4 Nov 2025
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Letter to complain to a trader about poor quality work by Citizens Advice
The Citizens Advice template letter to complain to a trader about poor quality work cites the Consumer Rights Act 2015, requests a remedy and goodwill discount, and sets a response deadline. It is part of Citizens Advice’s widely trusted library of open, lawyer-vetted letter templates.
Updated 3 Nov 2025
General
How We Handle Abusive Usage (Basecamp)
The How We Handle Abusive Usage policy explains how the company identifies, investigates, and addresses abusive use of its products while prioritizing privacy, fairness, and human oversight. Each case follows a structured process—discovery, investigation, and decision—guided by evidence, with account termination or other actions taken depending on the severity of the violation.
Updated 17 Oct 2025
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Letter to cancel goods or services bought at home or in a public place by Citizens Advice
The Citizens Advice template letter to cancel a contract made at home or in a public place allows consumers to withdraw within 14 days under the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013. It is part of Citizens Advice’s widely trusted library of open, lawyer-vetted letter templates.
Updated 3 Nov 2025
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Letter to complain about faulty goods bought from a company by Citizens Advice
The Citizens Advice template letter to complain about faulty goods helps consumers request a full refund under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. It is part of Citizens Advice’s widely trusted library of open, lawyer-vetted letter templates.
Updated 3 Nov 2025

Frequently asked questions

A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.

Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.

Yes, read about team plans here.

Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.

Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.

Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.

It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.

Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.

Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.

Trusted by thousands of businesses

“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”

MH

Michael Hawkes

Read more on Google

“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”

PM

Priyanka Mandal

Read more on Google

“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”

CE

Craig Edmunds

Read more on Google

“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”

BB

Bojana Banjac

Read more on Google

“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”

KL

Kristijan Lazic

Read more on Google

“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”

AM

Andjela Milovanovic

Read more on Google

“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”

RD

Romana Dražić

Read more on Google

“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”

“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”

MK

Marc Kimmel

Read more on Google

“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”

GG

Greg Gretsch

Managing Director

“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”

AB

Aleksandar Blazhev

Entrepreneur

“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”

MH

Michael Hawkes

Read more on Google

“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”

PM

Priyanka Mandal

Read more on Google

“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”

CE

Craig Edmunds

Read more on Google

“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”

BB

Bojana Banjac

Read more on Google

“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”

KL

Kristijan Lazic

Read more on Google

“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”

AM

Andjela Milovanovic

Read more on Google

“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”

RD

Romana Dražić

Read more on Google

“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”

“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”

MK

Marc Kimmel

Read more on Google

“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”

GG

Greg Gretsch

Managing Director

“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”

AB

Aleksandar Blazhev

Entrepreneur

“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”

MA

Maryia Alenina

Read more on Google

“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”

NM

Nishant Mandal

Read more on Google

“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”

AR

Aleksandra Radin

Read more on Google

“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”

“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”

AV

Anisija Vrućinić

Read more on Google

“I love it!!”

JD

Jelena Drazic

Read more on Google

“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”

TG

Tejas Gupta

Read more on Google

“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”

TD

Thomas Daly

Read more on Google

“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”

AC

Alex Cole

Founder, TIN Ventures

“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”

MB

Mrinal Bhatt

HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo

“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”

CH

Chris Hicken

Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid

“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”

MA

Maryia Alenina

Read more on Google

“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”

NM

Nishant Mandal

Read more on Google

“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”

AR

Aleksandra Radin

Read more on Google

“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”

“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”

AV

Anisija Vrućinić

Read more on Google

“I love it!!”

JD

Jelena Drazic

Read more on Google

“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”

TG

Tejas Gupta

Read more on Google

“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”

TD

Thomas Daly

Read more on Google

“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”

AC

Alex Cole

Founder, TIN Ventures

“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”

MB

Mrinal Bhatt

HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo

“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”

CH

Chris Hicken

Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid

From template to signed, in one place

Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.

1

Open

Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.

Free to open

2

Edit with AI

Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.

Tracked changes you can review

3

Send and sign

Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.

eSign included

Built for your legal work, with practicing lawyers

Trained on 5.5K+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.

Portrait headshots of the independent lawyers on the GitLaw standards committee

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

Start free

No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.

GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.