Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
Notice of Intention to Intervene in Rectification or Removal Proceedings (Form TM-27) (India) by Trade Marks Registry
Open Legal LibraryUpdated 12 Oct 2026
This form is used to apply for permission to intervene in ongoing legal proceedings concerning the rectification or removal of a trade mark from the official register. It is intended for third parties who have a specific interest in a trade mark and wish to be heard during its cancellation or modification process.
FORM TM-27
THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999
Agent's Code No:
Proprietor's Code No:
Fee : Rs.500
Application for leave to intervene in proceedings relating to the rectification of the register or the removal of trade mark from the register or the cancellation of a collective mark or certification trade mark from the register.
rule 94, 133, 139.
In the matter of the Trade Mark
No... registered in the name of ...in class ...
I ( we)'...
hereby apply for leave to intervene in the proceedings relating to the rectification or removal of the entry in the register in respect of the above mentioned trade mark .
My (our) interest in the Trade Mark...
All communications relating to this application may be sent to the following address in India:-
...
...
Dated this ...day of ...20...
2...
SIGNATURE
NAME OF SIGNATORY IN LETTERS
To
The Registrar of Trade Marks,
The Office of the Trade Marks Registry at 3...
State full name, address and nationality
Signature
State the name of the place of the appropriate office of the Trade Marks Registry
(See Rule 4).
5.0 out of 5 on Google
Read reviewsAs seen in
About this template
What is this template?
This is an official statutory form used to apply for leave to intervene in trade mark proceedings before the Registrar of Trade Marks in India. It is not a substantive witness statement or a primary application for rectification, but specifically a request for a third party to join existing litigation. The form requires the applicant to state their specific interest in the Trade Mark and provide an address for service in India.
When should you use it?
Use this form when you have a legal or commercial interest in a trade mark that is currently the subject of rectification or removal proceedings initiated by someone else. If you are the party initiating the removal yourself, use Form TM-26 instead.
Who it's for
- a party seeking leave to intervene in proceedings for the removal of a trade mark from the register
- an entity claiming an interest in a registered trade mark subject to cancellation of a collective mark
- a third party requesting participation in the rectification of the register under the Trade Marks Act 1999
How long it runs and how it's signed
How long
Used once
Signed by
Intervenor
Witness
Not required
Notarisation
Not required
Also needed
Fee of Rs.500 payable; Address for service in India required
Law it's drafted under
Governed by
THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999
Required by
rule 94
Required by
rule 133
Required by
rule 139
Categories
Jurisdiction
India
Document info
PDF document. Document created on Fri Jun 26th, 2026. Last updated on Mon Oct 12th, 2026.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
US
Content Removal Policies Submitting Content Removal Requests (GitHub)
This guidance document explains how to request the removal of infringing or private content from a hosting platform. It outlines specific procedures for DMCA copyright takedowns, trademark disputes, and the removal of confidential private information.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
France
Intellectual Property (IP) Agreement: Contrat de Transfert de PI (Fondateur & Mandataire Social) (France) by Seedsummit
Transfer the ownership of all software, inventions, and creative works from a company founder or corporate officer to their startup. This template establishes that the Société owns all intellectual property created during the founder's tenure and specifically references the French Intellectual Property Code.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Content Removal Policies Github Trademark Policy (GitHub)
This policy outlines how a platform manages trademark disputes and reports of unauthorized brand use. It defines what constitutes a violation, provides an reporting procedure for rights holders, and specifies the information required to investigate infringement claims.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Germany
Intellectual Property (IP) Transfer Agreement (Germany) by Seedsummit
Transfer intellectual property rights from an employee or freelancer to a German company. It covers copyrights, patents, and trade secrets, ensuring the company owns all work results created during the professional relationship.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Formulaic Content Policies by Mozilla
This content policy establishes rules for sharing formulas and generative AI prompts on a community platform. It defines prohibited content, including misleading descriptions, copyright infringement, violent material, and sexualized content, while detailing the enforcement actions and DMCA takedown procedures.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Report Copyright or Trademark Infringement by Mozilla
This document allows copyright and trademark owners to request the removal of infringing content from a company's services. It outlines the specific information required for a DMCA Notice and the subsequent Counter Notification process for users who believe their content was removed in error.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Frequently asked questions
A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.
Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.
Yes, read about team plans here.
Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.
Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.
Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.
It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.
Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.
Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.
Trusted by 5,000+ businesses
From template to signed, in one place
Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.
1
Open
Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.
Free to open
2
Edit with AI
Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.
Tracked changes you can review
3
Send and sign
Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.
eSign included
Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers
Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.
Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
Juliana Calil
Principal Counsel · Technology & Entertainment
20+ years in-house at Google, Intel, Disney and Looker
Adam Wardel
General Counsel, Data Privacy Officer & AI Advisor
12+ years leading legal & privacy for SaaS and AI companies
John Hoffman
Associate Director, Corporate Counsel · Life Sciences & Technology
20+ years in corporate counsel, incl. senior counsel at Certara
Richard Nohe
General Counsel · Telecom, Cloud & Data Centers
20+ years in-house, regional General Counsel at BT across 30+ countries
Joe Al-Khayat
General Counsel · Technology & High-Growth Companies
Cross-jurisdictional M&A and SaaS contracting across the UK, US & Australia
Joshua Woo
Technology, AI & Privacy Counsel · APAC
Former Goldman Sachs Executive Director for AI, cybersecurity & privacy in APAC
Sahil Verma
International Business & Investment Lawyer
13+ years in business law, investment law & dispute resolution
Matthew Willis
CRO & General Counsel · SaaS
Former President of the ACC's 2,200-attorney Chicago Chapter · JD + Kellogg MBA
Mayowa Ogunrinola
Legal Consultant · Fintech & AI Compliance
Regulatory strategy, AI governance & data protection for fintech and AI
Steven J. Shanker
Partner and Chair of Corporate and Employment Law
25+ years as a corporate & employment attorney in New York
Rebecca Babbage
Legal Counsel · Financial Services, Corporate & Governance
UK-qualified solicitor working in-house with regulated entities in financial services
As seen in
Ready to get started?
No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.
GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.