Free dismissal letters
Letting someone go? Do it fairly — and properly.
GitLaw walks you through a fair process and drafts every letter it needs — Acas-compliant in the UK, state-aware in the US. Free.
5.0 out of 5 on Google
Read reviewsAs featured in








The fair process
The Acas-shaped path — every letter drafted for you.
A UK dismissal is a sequence, not a letter: invite → hearing → outcome → appeal. Skip a step and a tribunal can uplift compensation by up to 25%. GitLaw drafts each one, in order.
Previewing for [Employee Name], Account Manager · misconduct track (UK)
6 August 2026
Private & confidential [Employee Name], Account Manager
Re: Invitation to a disciplinary hearing
Dear [Employee Name], I am writing to invite you to a disciplinary hearing on 13 August 2026 at 10:00 in the first-floor meeting room. The hearing will consider the following allegation: repeated failure to meet agreed client deadlines during May and June, despite the support plan we agreed together. Copies of the evidence we will rely on — the client correspondence and the notes of our earlier conversations — are enclosed with this letter. You have the right to be accompanied at the hearing by a colleague or a trade union representative. Please tell me before the hearing who will accompany you, or if the time causes difficulty. Please be aware that one possible outcome of the hearing is dismissal, although no decision has been made and none will be made until you have had a full opportunity to respond. If you have any questions about this letter or the process, please ask me before the hearing.
Disciplinary hearing — [Employee Name], Account Manager Scheduled: 13 August 2026, 10:00 · Chair: Priya Shah · Companion: to be confirmed Run the hearing fairly — the Acas Code in practice: ✓ Open by confirming the allegation and the possible outcomes ✓ Present the evidence — everything [Employee Name] has already received in writing ✓ Let [Employee Name] respond fully: their side, their evidence, their witnesses ✓ Companion rights: a colleague or trade union rep may address the hearing and confer with [Employee Name], but not answer questions for them ✓ Adjourn before deciding — never announce the outcome in the room ✓ Keep a written record of who said what After the adjournment, GitLaw drafts the outcome letter for whichever decision you reach — no action, a warning, or dismissal (step 3).
6 August 2026
Private & confidential [Employee Name], Account Manager
Re: Outcome of your disciplinary hearing
Dear [Employee Name], I am writing to confirm the outcome of your disciplinary hearing held on 13 August 2026, which you attended with your companion. Having considered the evidence and your responses carefully, the decision is that you are dismissed, with notice, on the ground of conduct: the repeated failure to meet agreed client deadlines set out in the invitation letter, which earlier warnings and support have not resolved. You are entitled to four weeks' notice under your contract. Your employment will end on the expiry of that notice; you will be paid to that date, together with any accrued but untaken holiday. You have the right to appeal this decision. If you wish to appeal, write to me within 7 days of receiving this letter, setting out your grounds. The appeal will be heard by someone not previously involved in this matter. Thank you for the contributions you have made during your employment.
6 August 2026
Private & confidential [Employee Name], Account Manager
Re: Outcome of your appeal
Dear [Employee Name], Thank you for attending your appeal hearing. Your appeal against the decision to dismiss you was heard by a manager not previously involved in the matter, and I am writing to confirm the outcome. We considered each of your grounds of appeal: the weight given to the client's late change requests, and whether the support plan gave you a fair opportunity to improve. Having reviewed the evidence and the notes of both hearings, the decision to dismiss is upheld, for the reasons set out in the enclosed note. This decision is final and there is no further right of appeal under our procedure. Your employment will end on the date previously confirmed, with pay and accrued holiday to that date. We will provide a factual reference on request, and your P45 will follow with your final payslip.
GitLaw drafts with trusted templates from its library
Browse all templatesWhat a dismissal has to get right
From 1 January 2027, UK employees can claim unfair dismissal after 6 months' service instead of 2 years — a fair, documented process is about to matter for almost every hire. In the US, at-will doesn't mean paperwork-free: final-pay deadlines and notice duties vary by state. Process is your protection.
Acas Code of Practice; Employment Rights Act 2025 (business.gov.uk); Employment Rights Act 1996 s.86
Plan the processHow it works
Describe the situation
The role, what happened, and where you are — GitLaw maps the right track: misconduct, capability, redundancy or an agreed exit.
Follow the process, letter by letter
UK: the Acas-shaped sequence — invite, hearing, outcome, appeal. US: a state-aware exit kit — termination letter plus a compliant severance agreement.
Keep the record
Every letter, note and deadline stays organised in your workspace — the documentation that protects you if the decision is ever challenged.
Built for your legal work, with practicing lawyers
Trained on 5.5K+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.

Trusted by thousands of businesses
“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”
“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”
“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”
“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”
“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”
“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”
“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”
“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”
“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”
“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”
Greg Gretsch
Managing Director
“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”
Aleksandar Blazhev
Entrepreneur
“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”
“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”
“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”
“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”
“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”
“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”
“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”
“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”
“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”
“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”
Greg Gretsch
Managing Director
“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”
Aleksandar Blazhev
Entrepreneur
“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”
“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”
“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”
“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”
“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”
“I love it!!”
“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”
“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”
“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”
Alex Cole
Founder, TIN Ventures
“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”
Mrinal Bhatt
HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo
“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”
Chris Hicken
Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid
“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”
“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”
“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”
“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”
“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”
“I love it!!”
“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”
“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”
“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”
Alex Cole
Founder, TIN Ventures
“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”
Mrinal Bhatt
HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo
“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”
Chris Hicken
Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid
Frequently asked questions
Today the general unfair-dismissal right needs 2 years' service, which gives employers more latitude early on — but day-one claims (discrimination, whistleblowing, asserting statutory rights) have no service requirement. And from 1 January 2027 the Employment Rights Act 2025 cuts the qualifying period to 6 months and removes the cap on compensatory awards. Run a fair process regardless of tenure — it's about to matter for almost everyone.
Under s.98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996: conduct, capability, redundancy, statutory illegality, and 'some other substantial reason'. You need one of these AND a fair process — a fair reason handled unfairly is still an unfair dismissal.
The Code isn't directly actionable by itself, but if a tribunal finds you unreasonably failed to follow it, it can increase compensation by up to 25%. The ladder above is the Code in letter form: investigate, invite in writing, hear them out, decide, offer an appeal.
The UK statutory minimum is one week per full year of service, capped at 12 weeks (ERA 1996 s.86) — the contract may promise more. Paying in lieu of notice is cleanest when the contract contains a PILON clause; without one, take advice before doing it. Gross misconduct can justify summary dismissal without notice — after a fair process.
You can hold a 'protected conversation' about an agreed exit — ERA 1996 s.111A keeps it out of an ordinary unfair-dismissal claim when handled properly — followed by a settlement agreement. To be valid the agreement must be in writing and the employee must receive independent legal advice on it; Acas guidance is to allow at least 10 days to consider the offer.
You can dismiss without notice for gross misconduct, but not without process. Suspend on full pay if needed, investigate, hold the hearing, then decide. 'Sacked in the corridor' is how factually strong cases get lost at tribunal.
The Acas Code expects it, and skipping it feeds the 25% uplift. The appeal should be heard by someone senior who wasn't involved in the original decision — in a small company that can be genuinely hard, so document who heard it and why.
Usually not by federal law — but several states require written notices (New York within 5 working days, including benefit end dates), final-paycheck deadlines vary wildly (California: same day, with waiting-time penalties), and unused-PTO payout is state-by-state. If you offer severance to someone 40 or over, the OWBPA requires at least 21 days to consider (45 for group layoffs) and 7 days to revoke. GitLaw's US kit asks your state and adapts the letter, the checklist and the severance agreement to it.
No. GitLaw is a self-service tool that helps you follow a fair, documented process and draft the letters it needs. It isn't a law firm and doesn't give legal advice — for a contested or senior exit, have an employment lawyer review the plan.
Fair for them. Safe for you.
The right process, every letter drafted, every deadline tracked. Free.
