Request to Divide a Trade Mark Application (Form TM-53) (India) by Trade Marks Registry

Open Legal LibraryUpdated 12 Oct 2026

This form is used to request the division of a trademark application in India. It allows an applicant to split a single application covering multiple classes of goods or services into separate applications.

FORM TM-53

THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999

Agents Code No:

Proprietor's Code No:

Fee: Rs.1,000 as Divisional fee plus appropriate class fee. See entry NO.68 of the first schedule.

On a request for the division of an application or of a single application for different classes of goods or services.

Proviso to Section 22 rule 104(1)

(to be filed in triplicate accompanied by three additional representation of the mark)

In the matter of Trade Mark NO...in Class... in the name of ... Made on ...

I (or we)${1}$ ...hereby request the Registrar to divide application NO... in class... in the following class or classes${2}$ and/ or to divide the specification of goods or services as indicated below:

...

...

A copy of the Registrar order on the request may be sent to the following address in India :-

Dated this ...day of ...

SIGNATURE

NAME OF SIGNATORY IN LETTERS

To

The Registrar of Trade Marks

The Office of the Trade Marks Registry at $^{3}$

Insert the full name, address and nationality of the applicant

Mention the goods or services and the class or classes in which it is to be registered in ascending numerical order

State the name of the place of the appropriate office of the Trade Marks Registry

(See rule 4)

5.0 out of 5 on Google

Read reviews

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

About this template

What is this template?

This is a formal filing for the Indian Trade Marks Registry to split an existing trademark application. It requires the original application number, the specific classes to be divided, and a revised specification of goods or services. It is not a new trademark application but a modification of a pending one.

When should you use it?

Use this form when you need to separate parts of a multi-class application into distinct filings to overcome partial objections or for strategic licensing. Use a new Form TM-A instead if you are filing a completely new trademark for the first time.

Who it's for

  • an applicant needing to divide a single trademark application into different classes of goods or services
  • a trademark owner splitting a specification of goods after receiving a Registrar order

How long it runs and how it's signed

How long
Used once
Signed by
applicant
Witness
Not required
Notarisation
Not required
Also needed
filed in triplicate; three additional representation of the mark; payment of Rs.1,000 divisional fee

Law it's drafted under

Governed by
THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999
Refers to
Section 22
Refers to
rule 104(1)
Categories
Jurisdiction
India
Document info
PDF document. Document created on Fri Jun 26th, 2026. Last updated on Mon Oct 12th, 2026.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
US
Content Removal Policies Submitting Content Removal Requests (GitHub)
This guidance document explains how to request the removal of infringing or private content from a hosting platform. It outlines specific procedures for DMCA copyright takedowns, trademark disputes, and the removal of confidential private information.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
France
Intellectual Property (IP) Agreement: Contrat de Transfert de PI (Fondateur & Mandataire Social) (France) by Seedsummit
Transfer the ownership of all software, inventions, and creative works from a company founder or corporate officer to their startup. This template establishes that the Société owns all intellectual property created during the founder's tenure and specifically references the French Intellectual Property Code.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Content Removal Policies Github Trademark Policy (GitHub)
This policy outlines how a platform manages trademark disputes and reports of unauthorized brand use. It defines what constitutes a violation, provides an reporting procedure for rights holders, and specifies the information required to investigate infringement claims.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Germany
Intellectual Property (IP) Transfer Agreement (Germany) by Seedsummit
Transfer intellectual property rights from an employee or freelancer to a German company. It covers copyrights, patents, and trade secrets, ensuring the company owns all work results created during the professional relationship.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Formulaic Content Policies by Mozilla
This content policy establishes rules for sharing formulas and generative AI prompts on a community platform. It defines prohibited content, including misleading descriptions, copyright infringement, violent material, and sexualized content, while detailing the enforcement actions and DMCA takedown procedures.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Report Copyright or Trademark Infringement by Mozilla
This document allows copyright and trademark owners to request the removal of infringing content from a company's services. It outlines the specific information required for a DMCA Notice and the subsequent Counter Notification process for users who believe their content was removed in error.
Updated 13 Aug 2026

Frequently asked questions

A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.

Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.

Yes, read about team plans here.

Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.

Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.

Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.

It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.

Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.

Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.

Trusted by 5,000+ businesses

Nexus logoMlabs logoTechstars logo

From template to signed, in one place

Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.

1

Open

Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.

Free to open

2

Edit with AI

Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.

Tracked changes you can review

3

Send and sign

Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.

eSign included

Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers

Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.

Adam Frankel

Adam Frankel

General Counsel · Technology & AI

15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies

US

Juliana Calil

Juliana Calil

Principal Counsel · Technology & Entertainment

20+ years in-house at Google, Intel, Disney and Looker

US · BR

Adam Wardel

Adam Wardel

General Counsel, Data Privacy Officer & AI Advisor

12+ years leading legal & privacy for SaaS and AI companies

US · UK · CA · EU

John Hoffman

John Hoffman

Associate Director, Corporate Counsel · Life Sciences & Technology

20+ years in corporate counsel, incl. senior counsel at Certara

US

Richard Nohe

Richard Nohe

General Counsel · Telecom, Cloud & Data Centers

20+ years in-house, regional General Counsel at BT across 30+ countries

US

Joe Al-Khayat

Joe Al-Khayat

General Counsel · Technology & High-Growth Companies

Cross-jurisdictional M&A and SaaS contracting across the UK, US & Australia

UK · US · AU

Joshua Woo

Joshua Woo

Technology, AI & Privacy Counsel · APAC

Former Goldman Sachs Executive Director for AI, cybersecurity & privacy in APAC

SG · HK

Sahil Verma

Sahil Verma

International Business & Investment Lawyer

13+ years in business law, investment law & dispute resolution

AE

Matthew Willis

Matthew Willis

CRO & General Counsel · SaaS

Former President of the ACC's 2,200-attorney Chicago Chapter · JD + Kellogg MBA

US

Mayowa Ogunrinola

Mayowa Ogunrinola

Legal Consultant · Fintech & AI Compliance

Regulatory strategy, AI governance & data protection for fintech and AI

NG

Steven J. Shanker

Steven J. Shanker

Partner and Chair of Corporate and Employment Law

25+ years as a corporate & employment attorney in New York

US

Rebecca Babbage

Rebecca Babbage

Legal Counsel · Financial Services, Corporate & Governance

UK-qualified solicitor working in-house with regulated entities in financial services

UK

Paul J. Kuo

Paul J. Kuo

Fractional General Counsel · Fintech & Payments

Founder of Twelvestone General Counsel and Chairman of PayU's Supervisory Board

US

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

Ready to get started?

No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.

GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.