SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition) — Statement of Claim
This document is prepared under the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), effective 1 January 2025. The Memorial archetype sets out full legal argument and evidence inline; contrast the Pleading archetype, which pleads material facts only.
This template numbers every paragraph, including optional ones, as though included. Delete any paragraph or clause that does not apply to this filing and renumber sequentially before submission.
Preliminary Matters
Include the following paragraph only if the Claimant elects, pursuant to Rule 6.4 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), to submit its Statement of Claim together with its Notice of Arbitration:
The Claimant elects to submit this Statement of Claim together with the Notice of Arbitration.
This arbitration may proceed under the Streamlined Procedure or the Expedited Procedure. If either applies, confirm the applicable timetable with the Registrar or Tribunal before filing this Statement of Claim, as this template assumes the standard procedural timetable.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
SIAC Case No.: [Insert case number, if assigned]
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE SIAC RULES (2025, 7th EDITION)
BETWEEN
[Claimant's name] of
[Claimant's address]
("Claimant")
— and —
[Respondent's name] of
[Respondent's address]
("Respondent")
Submitted on behalf of the Claimant by: [Representative's title] [Representative's name]
Date: [Date]
Introduction
This Statement of Claim is submitted pursuant to Rule 33.1–33.2 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition).
Section index: (I) Third-Party Funding Disclosure; (II) the Parties; (III) Jurisdiction; (IV) Factual Background; (V) Legal Grounds; (VI) Loss and Quantum; (VII) Relief Sought; (VIII) Annexure Schedule.
Third-Party Funding Disclosure
Pursuant to Rule 38.1 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), the Claimant discloses that no third-party funding agreement exists in relation to this claim as at the date of this Statement of Claim.
Where a third-party funding agreement exists, substitute the following for paragraph 3: Pursuant to Rule 38.1 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), the Claimant discloses the existence of a third-party funding agreement. The identity and contact details of the funder are [funder details].
Rule 38.1's disclosure obligation is formally triggered at the Notice of Arbitration/Response stage (Rules 6.3(h)/7.1(g)); repeating the disclosure here reflects standard drafting practice.
The Parties
The Claimant is [Claimant's name], [description].
The Respondent is [Respondent's name], [description].
Jurisdiction
The Tribunal has jurisdiction pursuant to the arbitration agreement at [clause reference], seated at [seat of arbitration].
This section is affirmative. If contested, the Respondent's jurisdictional plea is subject to the deadline in Rule 31.2(a) of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), under which an objection that the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction must be raised no later than in a Statement of Defence, or, with respect to a counterclaim, in a Statement of Defence to a Counterclaim. An early indication of a jurisdictional objection may also appear in the Response, per Rule 7.1(d), but Rule 31.2(a) is the operative time-bar.
Factual Background
Chronology. [Insert.]
Dramatis Personae. [Insert.]
Contractual Matrix. [Insert.]
Narrative. [Insert, cross-referenced to exhibits.]
Legal Grounds
This is a preview. The full template is free on GitLaw.
5.0 out of 5 on Google
Read reviewsAs seen in
Frequently asked questions
A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.
Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.
Yes, read about team plans here.
Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.
Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.
Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.
It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.
Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.
Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.
Trusted by 5,000+ businesses
From template to signed, in one place
Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.
Open
Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.
Free to open
Edit with AI
Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.
Tracked changes you can review
Send and sign
Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.
eSign included
Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers
Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.
As seen in
Ready to get started?
No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.
GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.