Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition) — Statement of Claim
This document is prepared under the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), effective 1 January 2025. The Memorial archetype sets out full legal argument and evidence inline; contrast the Pleading archetype, which pleads material facts only.
This template numbers every paragraph, including optional ones, as though included. Delete any paragraph or clause that does not apply to this filing and renumber sequentially before submission.
Preliminary Matters
Include the following paragraph only if the Claimant elects, pursuant to Rule 6.4 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), to submit its Statement of Claim together with its Notice of Arbitration:
The Claimant elects to submit this Statement of Claim together with the Notice of Arbitration.
This arbitration may proceed under the Streamlined Procedure or the Expedited Procedure. If either applies, confirm the applicable timetable with the Registrar or Tribunal before filing this Statement of Claim, as this template assumes the standard procedural timetable.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
SIAC Case No.: [Insert case number, if assigned]
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE SIAC RULES (2025, 7th EDITION)
BETWEEN
[Claimant's name] of
[Claimant's address]
("Claimant")
— and —
[Respondent's name] of
[Respondent's address]
("Respondent")
Submitted on behalf of the Claimant by: [Representative's title] [Representative's name]
Date: [Date]
Introduction
This Statement of Claim is submitted pursuant to Rule 33.1–33.2 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition).
Section index: (I) Third-Party Funding Disclosure; (II) the Parties; (III) Jurisdiction; (IV) Factual Background; (V) Legal Grounds; (VI) Loss and Quantum; (VII) Relief Sought; (VIII) Annexure Schedule.
Third-Party Funding Disclosure
Pursuant to Rule 38.1 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), the Claimant discloses that no third-party funding agreement exists in relation to this claim as at the date of this Statement of Claim.
Where a third-party funding agreement exists, substitute the following for paragraph 3: Pursuant to Rule 38.1 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), the Claimant discloses the existence of a third-party funding agreement. The identity and contact details of the funder are [funder details].
Rule 38.1's disclosure obligation is formally triggered at the Notice of Arbitration/Response stage (Rules 6.3(h)/7.1(g)); repeating the disclosure here reflects standard drafting practice.
The Parties
The Claimant is [Claimant's name], [description].
The Respondent is [Respondent's name], [description].
Jurisdiction
The Tribunal has jurisdiction pursuant to the arbitration agreement at [clause reference], seated at [seat of arbitration].
This section is affirmative. If contested, the Respondent's jurisdictional plea is subject to the deadline in Rule 31.2(a) of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), under which an objection that the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction must be raised no later than in a Statement of Defence, or, with respect to a counterclaim, in a Statement of Defence to a Counterclaim. An early indication of a jurisdictional objection may also appear in the Response, per Rule 7.1(d), but Rule 31.2(a) is the operative time-bar.
Factual Background
Chronology. [Insert.]
Dramatis Personae. [Insert.]
Contractual Matrix. [Insert.]
Narrative. [Insert, cross-referenced to exhibits.]
Legal Grounds
This is a preview. The full template is free on GitLaw.
5.0 out of 5 on Google
Read reviewsAs seen in
About this template
What is this template?
This is a formal legal pleading (Memorial) for an arbitration proceeding under the Singapore International Arbitration Centre Rules. It is not a Notice of Arbitration, but rather the document that sets out the substantive legal grounds and evidence for the claim. It contains specific sections for funding disclosure, the contractual matrix, and quantum particularization.
When should you use it?
Use this template when the procedural timetable requires a full Memorial rather than a simple Pleading. If only the material facts are required without full legal argument or evidence exhibits, use a Statement of Claim (Pleading) instead.
What's inside
| Clause | Name | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction | Establishes that the filing is submitted pursuant to Rule 33.1–33.2 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition). |
| 2 | Third-Party Funding Disclosure | Obliges the Claimant to disclose the existence of a third-party funding agreement and funder contact details per Rule 38.1. |
| 4 | Jurisdiction | Affirms the Tribunal's jurisdiction based on a specific arbitration agreement clause and the identified seat of arbitration. |
| 10 | Relief Sought | Requests specific declarations, monetary orders for quantum, interest at a stated rate, and the costs of the arbitration. |
| 11 | Annexure Schedule | Requires the attachment of supporting documents not previously submitted as mandated by Rule 33.7. |
Who it's for
- a party initiating or continuing arbitration administered by SIAC under the 2025 Rules
- a claimant electing to submit full legal arguments and evidence inline as a memorial
- a claimant disclosing third-party funding details to the Tribunal
- legal representatives preparing formal pleadings for a Singapore-seated or SIAC-governed dispute
How long it runs and how it's signed
How long
Used once
Signed by
Representative of the Claimant
Witness
Not required
Notarisation
Not required
Also needed
file with SIAC Registrar; renumber paragraphs before submission
Law it's drafted under
Governed by
SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition)
Refers to
Rule 33.1
Refers to
Rule 38.1
Refers to
Rule 33.7
Jurisdiction
Singapore
General
Document info
GitLaw document. Document created on Sun Aug 9th, 2026. Last updated on Mon Aug 10th, 2026.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 (Attribution-ShareAlike).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
Singapore
Statement of Counterclaim (Pleading) (SIAC Rules) by OLL
This template provides a formal structure for a Statement of Counterclaim under the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition). It is used in international arbitration when a respondent files a standalone claim against the claimant rather than merging it with the Statement of Defence.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedUnited Nations
Response to Notice of Arbitration (UNCITRAL Rules) by OLL
This formal response template allows a respondent to answer a Notice of Arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules. It provides structured sections for contesting jurisdiction, commenting on arbitrator nominations, and asserting counterclaims for damages.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Request for Arbitration (LCIA Rules) by OLL
This document is a formal request to initiate arbitration under the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) rules. It enables a claimant to define the dispute, nominate arbitrators, and state the specific financial relief and legal declarations sought from the tribunal. The template includes required sections for party details, the factual background of the breach, and proof of registration fee payment.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
United Nations
Statement of Claim (Memorial) (UNCITRAL Rules) by OLL
This template is a formal response for a respondent in an international arbitration governed by the 2021 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. It provides a structured framework for submitting a Statement of Defence, including factual backgrounds, legal grounds, and optional counterclaims.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
General
Landscaping Contract by EasyLegalDocs
This landscaping services agreement establishes the terms for garden maintenance, design, and installation work at a client's property. It covers recurring service schedules, payment terms, and technical requirements for project modifications.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Frequently asked questions
A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.
Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.
Yes, read about team plans here.
Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.
Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.
Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.
It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.
Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.
Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.
Trusted by 5,000+ businesses
From template to signed, in one place
Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.
1
Open
Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.
Free to open
2
Edit with AI
Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.
Tracked changes you can review
3
Send and sign
Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.
eSign included
Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers
Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.
Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
Juliana Calil
Principal Counsel · Technology & Entertainment
20+ years in-house at Google, Intel, Disney and Looker
Adam Wardel
General Counsel, Data Privacy Officer & AI Advisor
12+ years leading legal & privacy for SaaS and AI companies
John Hoffman
Associate Director, Corporate Counsel · Life Sciences & Technology
20+ years in corporate counsel, incl. senior counsel at Certara
Richard Nohe
General Counsel · Telecom, Cloud & Data Centers
20+ years in-house, regional General Counsel at BT across 30+ countries
Joe Al-Khayat
General Counsel · Technology & High-Growth Companies
Cross-jurisdictional M&A and SaaS contracting across the UK, US & Australia
Joshua Woo
Technology, AI & Privacy Counsel · APAC
Former Goldman Sachs Executive Director for AI, cybersecurity & privacy in APAC
Sahil Verma
International Business & Investment Lawyer
13+ years in business law, investment law & dispute resolution
Matthew Willis
CRO & General Counsel · SaaS
Former President of the ACC's 2,200-attorney Chicago Chapter · JD + Kellogg MBA
Mayowa Ogunrinola
Legal Consultant · Fintech & AI Compliance
Regulatory strategy, AI governance & data protection for fintech and AI
Steven J. Shanker
Partner and Chair of Corporate and Employment Law
25+ years as a corporate & employment attorney in New York
As seen in
Ready to get started?
No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.
GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.