Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
STATEMENT OF COUNTERCLAIM
DIAC Case No.: [Case No.]
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE DIAC ARBITRATION RULES 2022
BETWEEN
[Claimant's name]
[Claimant's address]
("Claimant," "Counterclaim-Respondent")
— and —
[Respondent's name]
[Respondent's address]
("Respondent," "Counterclaim-Claimant")
Submitted on behalf of the Respondent/Counterclaim-Claimant by: [Representative's title and name]
Date: [date]
This template numbers every paragraph, including optional ones, as though included. Delete any paragraph or clause that does not apply to this filing and renumber sequentially before submission.
Introduction
This Statement of Counterclaim is submitted pursuant to Article 5.4 (making of the counterclaim) and Article 24.2 (detailed counterclaim, filed within the Tribunal-set timetable together with all or part of the evidence relied upon, as determined by the Tribunal) of the DIAC Arbitration Rules 2022.
The counterclaim registration fee required by Article 5.5 (Appendix I, Article 1.1) [has been / will be] paid within 7 days of this submission.
Article 1.1 of the Rules defines "Counterclaim" broadly to include any claim or defence by way of set-off submitted by the Respondent. This document addresses the counterclaim only; set-off pleaded as a defence is addressed in the Statement of Defence.
The Parties
[Cross-reference the Statement of Defence rather than repeat, if filed jointly with or shortly after it.]
Jurisdiction
The Tribunal's jurisdiction over the Counterclaim arises from the same agreement to arbitrate pleaded in the Statement of Defence (Article 6.1). Any counterclaim-specific jurisdictional point, if distinct, is pleaded here and must, pursuant to Article 6.4, be raised no later than in any statement of defence to counterclaim.
Factual Background
[Insert factual narrative supporting the counterclaim.]
Legal Grounds
[State the legal basis for the counterclaim, with authorities.]
Loss, Damage and Quantum
The Counterclaim-Claimant has suffered loss and damage in the amount of [amount claimed in the Counterclaim], particularised as follows: [quantum breakdown].
Interest is claimed at [interest rate on the Counterclaim] from [date from which interest is claimed on the Counterclaim].
Relief Sought
The Respondent/Counterclaim-Claimant requests that the Tribunal: (a) AWARD [amount claimed in the Counterclaim] on the Counterclaim; (b) AWARD interest as pleaded above; (c) ORDER the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent to pay the costs associated with the Counterclaim; and (d) GRANT such further or other relief as the Tribunal considers just.
Annexure Schedule
Pursuant to Article 24.2, the evidence to be submitted with the Counterclaim is as determined by the Tribunal, applying equally to the Counterclaim.
Exhibit No. | Description | Referenced at ¶ |
[Document] | ¶ [ ] |
Respectfully submitted,
[Representative's title and name]
On behalf of the Respondent/Counterclaim-Claimant
Date: [date]
5.0 out of 5 on Google
Read reviewsAs seen in
About this template
What is this template?
This document is a formal legal filing known as a memorial for use in institutional arbitration. It contains specific placeholders for DIAC Case Numbers, Article 5.5 registration fee statuses, and quantum breakdowns. It is not a Statement of Defence, though it may be filed alongside one.
When should you use it?
Use this template when a Respondent intends to bring their own claims against the Claimant within a DIAC-administered arbitration. Use a Statement of Defence if the intent is only to dispute the original claim without seeking a separate award.
What's inside
| Clause | Name | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction | Invokes Article 5.4 and Article 24.2 of the DIAC Arbitration Rules 2022 to establish the procedural basis for the submission. |
| 3 | Jurisdiction | Asserts the Tribunal's authority over the Counterclaim based on the arbitration agreement referenced in Article 6.1. |
| 6 | Loss, Damage and Quantum | Requires the Counterclaim-Claimant to particularise the specific amount claimed and define the applicable interest rate and commencement date. |
| 7 | Relief Sought | Lists the formal requests for a monetary award, interest, and an order for costs against the Counterclaim-Respondent. |
| 8 | Annexure Schedule | Provides a table for listing evidentiary exhibits in accordance with the evidentiary standards set by the Tribunal under Article 24.2. |
Who it's for
- a respondent in a DIAC arbitration needing to submit a formal counterclaim
- legal counsel preparing a memorial under the DIAC Arbitration Rules 2022
- a party seeking to plead a set-off as a counterclaim in a Dubai-seated arbitration
How long it runs and how it's signed
How long
Used once
Signed by
Representative of the Respondent/Counterclaim-Claimant
Witness
Not required
Notarisation
Not required
Also needed
pay counterclaim registration fee within 7 days
Law it's drafted under
Governed by
DIAC Arbitration Rules 2022
Refers to
Article 5.4 DIAC Rules
Refers to
Article 24.2 DIAC Rules
Refers to
Article 6.1 DIAC Rules
Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Dubai (United Arab Emirates)
General
Document info
GitLaw document. Document created on Mon Aug 10th, 2026. Last updated on Mon Aug 10th, 2026.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
FeaturedUnited Nations
Response to Notice of Arbitration (UNCITRAL Rules) by OLL
This formal response template allows a respondent to answer a Notice of Arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules. It provides structured sections for contesting jurisdiction, commenting on arbitrator nominations, and asserting counterclaims for damages.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Singapore
Statement of Counterclaim (Pleading) (SIAC Rules) by OLL
This template provides a formal structure for a Statement of Counterclaim under the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition). It is used in international arbitration when a respondent files a standalone claim against the claimant rather than merging it with the Statement of Defence.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Request for Arbitration (LCIA Rules) by OLL
This document is a formal request to initiate arbitration under the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) rules. It enables a claimant to define the dispute, nominate arbitrators, and state the specific financial relief and legal declarations sought from the tribunal. The template includes required sections for party details, the factual background of the breach, and proof of registration fee payment.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
United Nations
Statement of Claim (Memorial) (UNCITRAL Rules) by OLL
This template is a formal response for a respondent in an international arbitration governed by the 2021 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. It provides a structured framework for submitting a Statement of Defence, including factual backgrounds, legal grounds, and optional counterclaims.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Hong Kong
Notice of Arbitration (HKIAC Rules) by OLL
This Notice of Arbitration initiates a formal dispute resolution process under the HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules. It requires the Claimant to identify the Respondent, state the legal basis for the claim, and provide a non-refundable registration fee of HKD 8,000.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Frequently asked questions
A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.
Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.
Yes, read about team plans here.
Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.
Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.
Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.
It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.
Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.
Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.
Trusted by 5,000+ businesses
From template to signed, in one place
Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.
1
Open
Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.
Free to open
2
Edit with AI
Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.
Tracked changes you can review
3
Send and sign
Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.
eSign included
Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers
Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.
Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
Juliana Calil
Principal Counsel · Technology & Entertainment
20+ years in-house at Google, Intel, Disney and Looker
Adam Wardel
General Counsel, Data Privacy Officer & AI Advisor
12+ years leading legal & privacy for SaaS and AI companies
John Hoffman
Associate Director, Corporate Counsel · Life Sciences & Technology
20+ years in corporate counsel, incl. senior counsel at Certara
Richard Nohe
General Counsel · Telecom, Cloud & Data Centers
20+ years in-house, regional General Counsel at BT across 30+ countries
Joe Al-Khayat
General Counsel · Technology & High-Growth Companies
Cross-jurisdictional M&A and SaaS contracting across the UK, US & Australia
Joshua Woo
Technology, AI & Privacy Counsel · APAC
Former Goldman Sachs Executive Director for AI, cybersecurity & privacy in APAC
Sahil Verma
International Business & Investment Lawyer
13+ years in business law, investment law & dispute resolution
Matthew Willis
CRO & General Counsel · SaaS
Former President of the ACC's 2,200-attorney Chicago Chapter · JD + Kellogg MBA
Mayowa Ogunrinola
Legal Consultant · Fintech & AI Compliance
Regulatory strategy, AI governance & data protection for fintech and AI
Steven J. Shanker
Partner and Chair of Corporate and Employment Law
25+ years as a corporate & employment attorney in New York
As seen in
Ready to get started?
No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.
GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.