Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
Statement of Defence to Counterclaim (Pleading) (SIAC Rules) by OLL
Open Legal LibraryUpdated 10 Aug 2026
Statement of Defence to Counterclaim under SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition)
This document comes from OLL's library of vetted legal templates
SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition) — Statement of Defence to Counterclaim
This is the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent's reply to the Respondent's Statement of Counterclaim, submitted under Rule 33.4, pleading bare material facts and traverse only, with no argument.
Preliminary Matters
This arbitration may proceed under the Streamlined Procedure or the Expedited Procedure. If either applies, confirm the applicable timetable.
Jurisdiction Gate — Counterclaim. Per Rule 31.2(a) of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition) — the second limb — any objection to jurisdiction over the Counterclaim must be raised in this document if not already raised. See Section 4 below.
STATEMENT OF DEFENCE TO COUNTERCLAIM
SIAC Case No.: [Insert case number, if assigned]
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE SIAC RULES (2025, 7th EDITION)
BETWEEN
[Claimant's name]
[Claimant's address]
("Claimant," "Counterclaim-Respondent")
— and —
[Respondent's name] of
[Respondent's address]
("Respondent," "Counterclaim-Claimant")
Submitted on behalf of the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent by: [Representative's title] [Representative's name]
Date: [Date]
Introduction
This Statement of Defence to Counterclaim is submitted pursuant to Rule 33.4, pleading material facts only. Section index: (I) Third-Party Funding Disclosure; (II) Jurisdiction (Counterclaim); (III) General Traverse; (IV) Paragraph-by-Paragraph Reply; (V) Rule 33.4(a) — Material Facts; (VI) Rule 33.4(b) — Cross-Claim/Set-Off (bare characterisation only); (VII) Rule 33.4(c) — Relief Sought.
Third-Party Funding Disclosure
Pursuant to Rule 38.1 of the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition), the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent discloses [state one: the existence of a third-party funding agreement, together with the identity and contact details of the funder; OR that no third-party funding agreement exists].
Jurisdiction (Counterclaim)
[State one: Objection to jurisdiction over the Counterclaim on the following bare basis: [state basis — no argument]; OR No objection is raised to jurisdiction over the Counterclaim.]
General Traverse
Save as expressly admitted below, the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent denies each allegation in the Statement of Counterclaim.
Paragraph-by-Paragraph Reply
Drafting note: use "Not Admitted" for allegations outside the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent's own knowledge, rather than a positive denial.
Material Facts
[Bare facts only, no argument.]
Rule 33.4(a) —
7. Cross-Claim / Set-Off (Bare Characterisation)
[Include the following paragraph only if the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent pleads set-off or a cross-claim within this document:]
Set-Off / Cross-Claim. Pleaded in the amount of [amount] — bare characterisation only, per Rule 33.4(b). This is a separate set-off from any pleaded by the Respondent in its own Statement of Defence.
Rule 33.4(b)
8. Relief Sought
The Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent seeks: (a) dismissal of the Statement of Counterclaim; [Include the following only if set-off/cross-claim is pleaded: (b) effect given to the set-off/cross-claim of [amount];] (c) costs of the Counterclaim; and (d) further or other relief.
Rule 33.4(c)
9.Reservations
The Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent reserves the right to amend or supplement this document pursuant to Rule 33.5.
Annexure Schedule
This is a preview. The full template is free on GitLaw.
5.0 out of 5 on Google
Read reviewsAs seen in
About this template
What is this template?
This is a formal pleading used in international arbitration to respond to a counterclaim. It is not an initial Statement of Claim or a full Statement of Defence, but a focused response limited to material facts and bare characterisations of set-offs. It specifically requires a mandatory third-party funding disclosure and a section for jurisdictional objections.
When should you use it?
Use this document when the Respondent in a SIAC-governed arbitration has filed a Statement of Counterclaim and the Claimant must reply within the timeframe set by Rule 33.4. Use a Statement of Defence and Counterclaim instead if you are the original Respondent initiating the counterclaim.
What's inside
| Clause | Name | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Section 2 | Third-Party Funding Disclosure | The Counterclaim-Respondent must disclose the existence, identity, and contact details of any third-party funder per SIAC Rule 38.1. |
| Section 3 | Jurisdiction (Counterclaim) | The party must state any bare jurisdictional objections to the Counterclaim as required by SIAC Rule 31.2(a). |
| Section 4 | General Traverse | The Counterclaim-Respondent denies every allegation in the Statement of Counterclaim unless specifically admitted. |
| Section 6 | Material Facts | The document requires a statement of bare material facts without argument in accordance with SIAC Rule 33.4(a). |
| Section 8 | Relief Sought | The Claimant requests dismissal of the Counterclaim, specific costs, and effect given to any pleaded set-off under Rule 33.4(c). |
| Section 10 | Annexure Schedule | The submission must include copies of all supporting documents not previously submitted by any party per SIAC Rule 33.7. |
Who it's for
- a claimant in a SIAC arbitration responding to a counterclaim filed by the respondent
- legal representatives drafting a streamlined or expedited defence to a counterclaim under the 2025 SIAC Rules
How long it runs and how it's signed
How long
Used once
Signed by
Representative of the Claimant/Counterclaim-Respondent
Witness
Not required
Notarisation
Not required
Also needed
file with SIAC Secretariat; serve on all parties
Law it's drafted under
Governed by
SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition)
Jurisdiction
Singapore
General
Document info
GitLaw document. Document created on Sun Aug 9th, 2026. Last updated on Mon Aug 10th, 2026.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 (Attribution-ShareAlike).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
Singapore
Statement of Counterclaim (Pleading) (SIAC Rules) by OLL
This template provides a formal structure for a Statement of Counterclaim under the SIAC Rules (2025, 7th Edition). It is used in international arbitration when a respondent files a standalone claim against the claimant rather than merging it with the Statement of Defence.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedUnited Nations
Response to Notice of Arbitration (UNCITRAL Rules) by OLL
This formal response template allows a respondent to answer a Notice of Arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules. It provides structured sections for contesting jurisdiction, commenting on arbitrator nominations, and asserting counterclaims for damages.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Request for Arbitration (LCIA Rules) by OLL
This document is a formal request to initiate arbitration under the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) rules. It enables a claimant to define the dispute, nominate arbitrators, and state the specific financial relief and legal declarations sought from the tribunal. The template includes required sections for party details, the factual background of the breach, and proof of registration fee payment.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
United Nations
Statement of Claim (Memorial) (UNCITRAL Rules) by OLL
This template is a formal response for a respondent in an international arbitration governed by the 2021 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. It provides a structured framework for submitting a Statement of Defence, including factual backgrounds, legal grounds, and optional counterclaims.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Hong Kong
Notice of Arbitration (HKIAC Rules) by OLL
This Notice of Arbitration initiates a formal dispute resolution process under the HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules. It requires the Claimant to identify the Respondent, state the legal basis for the claim, and provide a non-refundable registration fee of HKD 8,000.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Frequently asked questions
A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.
Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.
Yes, read about team plans here.
Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.
Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.
Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.
It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.
Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.
Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.
Trusted by 5,000+ businesses
From template to signed, in one place
Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.
1
Open
Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.
Free to open
2
Edit with AI
Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.
Tracked changes you can review
3
Send and sign
Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.
eSign included
Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers
Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.
Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
Juliana Calil
Principal Counsel · Technology & Entertainment
20+ years in-house at Google, Intel, Disney and Looker
Adam Wardel
General Counsel, Data Privacy Officer & AI Advisor
12+ years leading legal & privacy for SaaS and AI companies
John Hoffman
Associate Director, Corporate Counsel · Life Sciences & Technology
20+ years in corporate counsel, incl. senior counsel at Certara
Richard Nohe
General Counsel · Telecom, Cloud & Data Centers
20+ years in-house, regional General Counsel at BT across 30+ countries
Joe Al-Khayat
General Counsel · Technology & High-Growth Companies
Cross-jurisdictional M&A and SaaS contracting across the UK, US & Australia
Joshua Woo
Technology, AI & Privacy Counsel · APAC
Former Goldman Sachs Executive Director for AI, cybersecurity & privacy in APAC
Sahil Verma
International Business & Investment Lawyer
13+ years in business law, investment law & dispute resolution
Matthew Willis
CRO & General Counsel · SaaS
Former President of the ACC's 2,200-attorney Chicago Chapter · JD + Kellogg MBA
Mayowa Ogunrinola
Legal Consultant · Fintech & AI Compliance
Regulatory strategy, AI governance & data protection for fintech and AI
Steven J. Shanker
Partner and Chair of Corporate and Employment Law
25+ years as a corporate & employment attorney in New York
Rebecca Babbage
Legal Counsel · Financial Services, Corporate & Governance
UK-qualified solicitor working in-house with regulated entities in financial services
As seen in
Ready to get started?
No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.
GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.