4.1 Acceptable Use Policies - Disrupting the Experience of Other Users

FfilmshakeUpdated 17 Oct 2025

This document outlines acceptable behavior for users within an online community, specifically focusing on actions that disrupt the experience of others. It details various types of disruptive conduct, such as posting off-topic comments or creating meaningless issues, and notes that platform staff may take action against such behaviors. The template is designed to be adapted for different communities and purposes, with a strong reference to GitHub's policies.

Disrupting the Experience of Other Users

This document is taken from the GitHub website - more information about GitHub and its functions can be found at https://github.com/. Please note that many of the included provisions are designed for GitHub or similar site (such as for building and developing software with online communities), so they are not relevant to all types of business.

You can amend this document to be suitable for your own Community and purposes using the smart fields and customizing the bracketed sections. We recommend adding hyperlinks to your own policies and website pages - make sure your business has in place all the policies referred to here.

Please find the other specific GitHub Acceptable Use Policies in this 'GitHub Site Policies for Startups' repository.

Being part of a community includes recognizing how your behavior affects others and engaging in meaningful and productive interactions with people and the platform they rely on.

We do not allow behavior that significantly or continually disrupts the experience of other users. This includes:

Posting off-topic comments

Opening empty or meaningless issues or pull requests

Starring and/or following accounts or repositories in large volume in a short period of time

Creating nonsensical or irrelevant code reviews

Engaging with platform features in a way that causes excessive notifications for other users

Using any other platform feature in a way that creates disruption

While we encourage maintainers to moderate their own projects on an individual basis, [company name] staff may take further restrictive action against accounts that are engaging in these types of behaviors.

Please note that the above conduct may also violate other restrictions in our [Acceptable Use] Policies. For example, depending on the nature and severity of the activity, it may rise to the level of bullying and harassment.

5.0 out of 5 on Google

Read reviews

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

United States note

This version is drafted for US law generally. Contract, employment and consumer rules vary by state — for example on non-competes and at-will employment. Tell GitLaw which state applies and it adjusts the draft.

Jurisdiction
United States of America
Document info
HTML document. Document created on Tue Jul 15th, 2025. Last updated on Fri Oct 17th, 2025.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
Report a Violation on Formulaic by Mozilla
This notice explains how users can report content policy violations on a digital platform and outlines the subsequent moderation and appeals process. It specifies the information required for a report, the potential penalties for publishers, and the six-month window for appealing a moderation decision.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
VPN Privacy Notice by Mozilla
This privacy notice explains how a VPN service handles user data, encryption, and third-party sharing. It details the collection of account info, approximate location via IP address, and limited billing details from providers like Stripe or Apple.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedUS
Acceptable Use Policy by Mozilla
This policy defines prohibited activities for users of a company's digital services and products. It establishes clear boundaries against illegal acts, harassment, malware distribution, and intellectual property infringement while reserving the right to suspend users who violate these terms.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
California (US)
Terms of Service by Mozilla
This agreement sets out the legal terms for using the software and services provided by a technology corporation, including both free and paid subscription levels. It establishes user conduct rules, licensing restrictions, and mandatory arbitration for resolving disputes under California law.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Security Policies Github Sirt Description Rfc 2350 (GitHub)
This document provides a standardized description of a Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) following the RFC 2350 protocol. It details contact methods, the team's mission and authority, and specific procedures for handling security incidents.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
India
Affidavit for Substitution of Karta (India).docx
This affidavit formalises the request to substitute the Karta (manager) of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). It is used following the death of a previous Karta to record the succession of the eldest male member as the new head of the HUF.
Updated 13 Aug 2026

Frequently asked questions

A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.

Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.

Yes, read about team plans here.

Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.

Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.

Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.

It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.

Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.

Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.

Trusted by 5,000+ businesses

Nexus logoMlabs logoTechstars logo

From template to signed, in one place

Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.

1

Open

Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.

Free to open

2

Edit with AI

Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.

Tracked changes you can review

3

Send and sign

Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.

eSign included

Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers

Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

Ready to get started?

No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.

GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.