
Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
[This template applies only where: (1) the Respondent has pleaded a Counterclaim in its Statement of Defence under Art. 15.3; and (2) the Claimant's Statement of Reply included a Statement of Defence to Counterclaim under Art. 15.4. This document is filed by the Respondent, as Counterclaim-Claimant.]
LCIA Case No.: [Case No.]
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE LCIA ARBITRATION RULES (2020)
BETWEEN
[Claimant's name]
[Claimant's address]
("Claimant," "Counterclaim-Respondent")
— and —
[Respondent's name]
[Respondent's address]
("Respondent," "Counterclaim-Claimant")
Submitted on behalf of the Respondent/Counterclaim-Claimant by: [Representative's title and name]
Date: [date]
This Statement of Reply to the Defence to Counterclaim is submitted pursuant to Art. 15.5 of the LCIA Arbitration Rules (2020), pleading material facts only in response to new matters raised in the Claimant's Defence to Counterclaim, within 28 days of the Respondent's receipt of the Claimant's Statement of Reply.
Save as the Tribunal may otherwise direct, this document is the last written statement to be filed in the arbitration, pursuant to Art. 15.6 of the LCIA Rules.
[Bare facts addressing new matters raised in the Defence to Counterclaim — no argument.]
[Bare response to any affirmative defences or set-off pleaded by the Claimant against the Counterclaim.]
The Respondent/Counterclaim-Claimant maintains its request for:
[counterclaim quantum amount] on the Counterclaim;
interest as pleaded in the Statement of Defence/Counterclaim;
costs of the Counterclaim; and
further or other relief.
All documents relied upon by the Respondent/Counterclaim-Claimant accompany this Statement of Reply to the Defence to Counterclaim, in accordance with Art. 15.5, as follows:
Exhibit No. | Description | Referenced at ¶ |
Respectfully submitted,
[Representative's title and name]
On behalf of the Respondent/Counterclaim-Claimant
Date: [date]
5.0 out of 5 on Google
Read reviewsAs seen in








This is a formal arbitration pleading used in LCIA proceedings to respond specifically to a Defence to Counterclaim. It is not a generic Statement of Defence or a new Counterclaim, and it explicitly limits content to material facts in response to new matters. It includes an Annexure Schedule for exhibits cross-referenced to paragraph numbers.
Use this template when the Claimant has filed a Statement of Reply that includes a Statement of Defence to your Counterclaim. Use the LCIA Statement of Defence and Counterclaim instead if you are responding to the initial Request for Arbitration.
| Clause | Name | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction | Identifies that the document is submitted pursuant to Article 15.5 of the LCIA Rules for pleading material facts only. |
| 2 | Reply to the Defence to Counterclaim | Provides a section for the Counterclaim-Claimant to address bare facts and affirmative defences raised in the previous pleading. |
| 3 | Relief Sought | Maintains the request for a specific counterclaim quantum amount and interest as originally pleaded. |
| 4 | Annexure Schedule | Lists all supporting documents relied upon by the Respondent, mapped to specific paragraph references. |
This version is drafted for England & Wales. Scotland and Northern Ireland differ on some points — for example notice periods and tribunal procedure. Tell GitLaw where you hire and it adjusts the draft.
A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.
Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.
Yes, read about team plans here.
Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.
Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.
Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.
It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.
Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.
Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.


Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.
Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.
Free to open
Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.
Tracked changes you can review
Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.
eSign included
Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.
As seen in








No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.
GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.
The Claimant's reply to the Statement of Defence under Art. 15.4, due 28 days from receipt of the Statement of Defence (or the Respondent's election under Art. 15.3(i)). This is the pleading form — bare material facts addressing new matters raised in the Defence, and, where the Respondent raised a Counterclaim, a bare-facts Defence to Counterclaim only. Use where the Tribunal directs a facts-first approach or counsel prefers to defer legal argument.
This document comes from OLL's library of vetted legal templates.