Model PIPE Form of Common Warrant (US Issuer) (NVCA)

NVCAUpdated 17 Oct 2025

This is a model form of a common stock warrant, typically used in Private Investment in Public Equity (PIPE) financings. It grants the holder the right to purchase a specified number of common shares from the issuing company at a predetermined exercise price. The document includes detailed provisions for issuance, transfer, exercise, adjustments for corporate events, and limitations on exercise.

This model document is the work product of a national coalition of attorneys who represent investors, issuers and bank placement agents in PIPE financings. This document should be tailored to meet your specific requirements, and should not be construed as legal advice for any particular facts or circumstances.¹

¹ These model PIPE documents (for a US issuer) have not been tailored for use in connection with a reverse merger, a deSPAC transaction or a financing requiring stockholder approval under NYSE or Nasdaq rules. 

 THIS WARRANT AND THE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUABLE UPON THE EXERCISE OF THIS WARRANT (THE “SECURITIES”) HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES. THE SECURITIES HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR ASSIGNED UNLESS (I) SUCH SECURITIES HAVE BEEN REGISTERED FOR SALE PURSUANT TO THE SECURITIES ACT, (II) SUCH SECURITIES MAY BE SOLD PURSUANT TO RULE 144, (III) THE COMPANY HAS RECEIVED AN OPINION OF COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO IT THAT SUCH TRANSFER MAY LAWFULLY BE MADE WITHOUT REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, OR (IV) THE SECURITIES ARE TRANSFERRED WITHOUT CONSIDERATION TO AN AFFILIATE OF SUCH HOLDER OR A CUSTODIAL NOMINEE (WHICH FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT SHALL REQUIRE NEITHER CONSENT NOR THE DELIVERY OF AN OPINION).

 

FORM OF WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK²

² Company should have its outside auditor review and sign-off on the accounting treatment of the Common Warrant.

Number of Shares: [·]
(subject to adjustment)

Warrant No. [·]                                                                         Original Issue Date: [·], 20[  ]

[                       ], a [Delaware] corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, [·] or its registered assigns (the “Holder”), is entitled, subject to the terms set forth below, to purchase from the Company up to a total of [·] shares of common stock, [$0.         ] par value per share (the “Common Stock”), of the Company (each such share, a “Warrant Share” and all such shares, the “Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price per share equal to [$                  ]³ (the “Exercise Price”), in each case as adjusted from time to time as provided in Section 9, upon surrender of this Warrant to Purchase Common Stock (including any Warrants to Purchase Common Stock issued in exchange, transfer or replacement hereof, the “Warrant”) at any time and from time to time on or after [                 ]⁴ (the “Initial Exercise Date”) and on or prior to 5 p.m. (New York City time) on [                            ] of the [                                    ] (the “Termination Date”)⁵ but not thereafter.

This is a preview. The full template is free on GitLaw.

5.0 out of 5 on Google

Read reviews

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

New York note

This version is drafted for New York. US contract and employment rules vary by state, so it will not transfer cleanly elsewhere. Tell GitLaw where the parties are and it adjusts the draft.

Jurisdiction
Delaware (US)
New York (US)
United States of America
Document info
HTML document. Document created on Wed Sep 10th, 2025. Last updated on Fri Oct 17th, 2025.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
US
Model PIPE Form of Common Warrant (US Issuer) (NVCA)
This template provides a standard instrument for a US corporation to grant an investor the right to purchase common stock at a set price. It includes sophisticated provisions for cashless exercise, anti-dilution adjustments, and a 4.99% or 9.99% beneficial ownership cap.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedNew York (US)
Model PIPE Securities Purchase Agreement (FPI) (NVCA)
This template is a securities purchase agreement for private investments in public equity (PIPE) involving foreign private issuers. It facilitates the sale of ordinary shares, American Depositary Shares (ADSs), or warrants to institutional investors under SEC registration exemptions. The document includes detailed representations regarding regulatory compliance, financial reporting, and the legal status of securities in non-U.S. jurisdictions.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedUS
SAFE: MFN, No Valuation Cap, No Discount (US) by Y Combinator
This Y Combinator SAFE grants an investor the right to future equity in a company without a valuation cap or discount, featuring a Most Favored Nations (MFN) clause. It is used for early-stage startup funding where the investor's SAFE will convert to preferred stock during a subsequent equity financing round.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Singapore
Convertible Note Term Sheet by Cofounders
This non-binding term sheet outlines the core conditions for a convertible promissory note financing round up to $1,000,000 SGD. It defines the conversion mechanisms, including a 25% discount and a $3,500,000 SGD valuation cap for pre-seed and seed-stage investments.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Short Form Auction Confidentiality Agreement for Buyouts by BVCA
This short-form non-disclosure agreement is for the initial stage of a buyout auction where a high volume of bidders requires a non-negotiable legal framework. It facilitates the quick release of preliminary information like an information memorandum while deferring complex negotiations to a second-round long-form agreement.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Germany
Term Sheet (Germany) by Seedsummit
This term sheet outlines the principal investment terms for a Series Seed financing of a German company. It defines the economic stakes, control rights, and investor protections such as liquidation preferences and anti-dilution clauses.
Updated 13 Aug 2026

Frequently asked questions

A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.

Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.

Yes, read about team plans here.

Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.

Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.

Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.

It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.

Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.

Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.

Trusted by 5,000+ businesses

Nexus logoMlabs logoTechstars logo

From template to signed, in one place

Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.

1

Open

Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.

Free to open

2

Edit with AI

Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.

Tracked changes you can review

3

Send and sign

Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.

eSign included

Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers

Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.

Adam Frankel

Adam Frankel

General Counsel · Technology & AI

15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies

US

Juliana Calil

Juliana Calil

Principal Counsel · Technology & Entertainment

20+ years in-house at Google, Intel, Disney and Looker

US · BR

Adam Wardel

Adam Wardel

General Counsel, Data Privacy Officer & AI Advisor

12+ years leading legal & privacy for SaaS and AI companies

US · UK · CA · EU

John Hoffman

John Hoffman

Associate Director, Corporate Counsel · Life Sciences & Technology

20+ years in corporate counsel, incl. senior counsel at Certara

US

Richard Nohe

Richard Nohe

General Counsel · Telecom, Cloud & Data Centers

20+ years in-house, regional General Counsel at BT across 30+ countries

US

Joe Al-Khayat

Joe Al-Khayat

General Counsel · Technology & High-Growth Companies

Cross-jurisdictional M&A and SaaS contracting across the UK, US & Australia

UK · US · AU

Joshua Woo

Joshua Woo

Technology, AI & Privacy Counsel · APAC

Former Goldman Sachs Executive Director for AI, cybersecurity & privacy in APAC

SG · HK

Sahil Verma

Sahil Verma

International Business & Investment Lawyer

13+ years in business law, investment law & dispute resolution

AE

Matthew Willis

Matthew Willis

CRO & General Counsel · SaaS

Former President of the ACC's 2,200-attorney Chicago Chapter · JD + Kellogg MBA

US

Mayowa Ogunrinola

Mayowa Ogunrinola

Legal Consultant · Fintech & AI Compliance

Regulatory strategy, AI governance & data protection for fintech and AI

NG

Steven J. Shanker

Steven J. Shanker

Partner and Chair of Corporate and Employment Law

25+ years as a corporate & employment attorney in New York

US

Rebecca Babbage

Rebecca Babbage

Legal Counsel · Financial Services, Corporate & Governance

UK-qualified solicitor working in-house with regulated entities in financial services

UK

As seen in

Law360
Artificial Lawyer
Insider
Axios Pro
San Francisco Business Times
Built In
Startups Magazine
Business Reporter
Tech.eu

Ready to get started?

No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.

GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.