Quashing of Multiple FIRs and Transfer of Investigation to the CBI (India) by OLL
This document outlines the legal principles and precedents regarding the quashing of multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) and the transfer of investigations to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in India. It focuses on protecting fundamental rights like free speech and preventing the abuse of the legal process through repetitive complaints for the same incident.
QUASHING OF MULTIPLE FIRS AND TRANSFER OF INVESTIGATION TO CBI
Multiple FIRs - Quashing of - Governing principles. Held, where two or more FIRs relate to same incident or relate to incidents which form part of same transactions, subsequent FIRs are liable to be quashed. There can be no second FIR where information concerns the same cognisable offence alleged in the first FIR or the same occurrence or incident which gives rise to one or more cognisable offences. This is because investigation covers not only alleged cognisable offence but also other connected offences. But subsequent FIR relating to different incidents or crimes is maintainable. Filing of a second complaint in regard to same incident as a counter complaint is also not precluded nor is this course of action prohibited by CrPC. TT Antony’s case, referred. (Paras 28-30.1)
Multiple FIRs – Quashing of – A programme telecasted on R Bharat on 21.4.2020 by petitioner (journalist) became the foundation of the allegation of commission of offences under the provisions of Sections 153, 153A, 153B, 295A, 298, 500, 504 and 506 IPC - On basis of this cause of action, several FIRs and criminal complaints lodged against him in different States and UT of J & K - Whether multiple FIRs need to be quashed. Held, yes. Except main FIR [FIR 238 of 2020 dated 22.4.2020] all other FIRs need to be quashed. This is because all FIRs or complaints arose out of one and the same incident and had same cause of action. Complaints were worded in identical terms. Even language, content and sequencing of paragraphs and their numbering were identical. Therefore subsequent FIRs were an abuse of process of law and are quashed. (Para 31)
Ed. : Quashing of those FIRs would not amount to expression of any opinion by Supreme Court on merits of the main FIR.
Constitution of India, 1950
This is a preview. The full template is free on GitLaw.
5.0 out of 5 on Google
Read reviewsAs seen in
About this template
What is this template?
This document is a legal case summary and digest of governing principles regarding the quashing of redundant FIRs and the threshold for CBI transfers. It is not a court petition or a dynamic template for filing a writ, but rather a reference for legal arguments and judicial precedents.
When should you use it?
Use this when preparing a petition under Article 32 or Section 482 of the CrPC to consolidate or dismiss multiple criminal complaints arising from a single act. The nearest alternative would be a standard Writ Petition template for the Supreme Court of India.
What's inside
| Clause | Name | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Paras 28-30.1 | Governing Principles for Quashing FIRs | Prohibits a second FIR where information concerns the same cognisable offence or incident already alleged in a first FIR. |
| Para 32 | Constitutional Protection for Journalists | Balances Article 19(1)(a) fundamental rights against the CrPC investigation process, protecting journalists from stifling effects of multiple state-wide complaints. |
| Paras 36-38 | Transfer of Investigation to CBI | Defines the power to transfer investigations to the CBI as an extraordinary measure used sparingly in rare and exceptional circumstances. |
| Para 39.1 | Rights of the Accused in Interrogation | Vests the investigating agency with discretion to determine the venue, timing, and nature of questions during interrogation of an accused. |
| Para 47 | Criminal Defamation Filing Limits | Clarifies that an FIR cannot be filed for criminal defamation under Section 199(6) CrPC as it requires a personal complaint. |
Who it's for
- a legal practitioner in India seeking to quash multiple FIRs filed for the same television broadcast
- a journalist facing criminal complaints across different Indian states and UTs for the same cause of action
- an accused party requesting a transfer of a local police investigation to the CBI
Law it's drafted under
Frequently asked questions
A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.
Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.
Yes, read about team plans here.
Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.
Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.
Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.
It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.
Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.
Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.
Trusted by 5,000+ businesses
From template to signed, in one place
Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.
Open
Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.
Free to open
Edit with AI
Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.
Tracked changes you can review
Send and sign
Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.
eSign included
Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers
Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.
As seen in
Ready to get started?
No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.
GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.