Free client services agreement
Your next client, on your terms.
Name your business and your client — GitLaw drafts a tailored services agreement with the clauses that protect you: payment, IP, liability, scope. US & UK. Free.
5.0 out of 5 on Google
Read reviewsAs featured in








The deliverable
One agreement that covers the whole engagement.
Not a mail-merge template: payment terms, IP hand-over, a liability cap and scope-change control, drafted for your engagement — with the agent explaining why each clause is there.
CLIENT SERVICES AGREEMENT
This agreement is made between Harbor & Slate Consulting (the "Provider") and Juniper Retail Group (the "Client").
1. Services. The Provider will provide the Client with the services described in the attached scope of work (the "Services"), with the skill and care reasonably expected of a professional provider. 2. Term. This agreement starts when both parties sign and continues until the Services are complete, unless ended earlier under clause 8. 3. Fees and payment. The Client will pay the fees set out in the scope of work. Invoices are due within 14 days. Overdue balances accrue a late charge of 1.5% per month, or the highest rate allowed by law if lower, and the Provider may pause work while any invoice is more than 14 days overdue. 4. Scope changes. Work outside the scope of work requires a signed change order stating the change, the fee and any revised timeline. Neither party is bound by a change until it is agreed in writing. 5. Intellectual property. On payment in full, the Provider assigns to the Client all right, title and interest in the final deliverables. The Provider keeps ownership of its pre-existing tools, templates and know-how, and grants the Client a perpetual licence to use them as embedded in the deliverables. 6. Confidentiality. Each party will keep the other's non-public information confidential and use it only to perform this agreement. 7. Liability. Each party's total liability under this agreement is capped at the fees paid or payable in the 12 months before the claim, and neither party is liable for indirect or consequential loss. Nothing in this agreement limits liability that cannot be limited by law. 8. Termination. Either party may end this agreement on 30 days' written notice. The Client will pay for all work performed to the end date, plus the agreed cancellation fee, if any. Either party may end this agreement immediately if the other materially breaches it and fails to cure the breach within 14 days of written notice. 9. Relationship. The Provider is an independent contractor, not an employee, and is responsible for its own taxes. 10. Governing law. This agreement is governed by the law of the state named in the scope of work, and the parties submit to the courts of that state.
CLIENT SERVICES AGREEMENT
This agreement is made between Harbor & Slate Consulting (the "Provider") and Juniper Retail Group (the "Client").
1. Services. The Provider will provide the Client with the services described in the attached statement of work (the "Services"), with reasonable skill and care. 2. Term. This agreement starts when both parties sign and continues until the Services are complete, unless ended earlier under clause 8. 3. Fees and payment. The Client will pay the fees set out in the statement of work. Invoices are due within 14 days. Overdue sums carry statutory interest at 8% a year above the Bank of England base rate, plus fixed recovery costs, under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998, and the Provider may suspend work while any invoice is more than 14 days overdue. 4. Scope changes. Work outside the statement of work requires a signed variation stating the change, the fee and any revised timeline. Neither party is bound by a variation until it is agreed in writing. 5. Intellectual property. On payment in full, the Provider assigns to the Client, with full title guarantee, all intellectual property rights in the final deliverables. The Provider keeps ownership of its pre-existing tools, templates and know-how, and grants the Client a perpetual licence to use them as embedded in the deliverables. 6. Confidentiality. Each party will keep the other's non-public information confidential and use it only to perform this agreement. 7. Liability. Each party's total liability under this agreement is capped at the fees paid or payable in the 12 months before the claim, and neither party is liable for indirect or consequential loss. Nothing in this agreement excludes liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence, fraud, or any other liability that cannot be excluded by law. 8. Termination. Either party may end this agreement on 30 days' written notice. The Client will pay for all work performed to the end date, plus the agreed cancellation fee, if any. Either party may end this agreement immediately if the other materially breaches it and fails to remedy the breach within 14 days of written notice. 9. Relationship. The Provider is an independent contractor. Nothing in this agreement creates an employment relationship, partnership or agency between the parties. 10. Governing law. This agreement is governed by the law of England and Wales, and the parties submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of its courts.
The agent also prepares these — for when this client grows
Locked until you create your free accountGitLaw drafts with trusted templates from its library
Browse all templatesWhat a generic template leaves on the table
Free templates skip the clauses that actually get contested — payment, IP ownership, liability, scope creep. GitLaw drafts them for your engagement and explains why each one is there.
LegalZoom published pricing; gov.uk guidance on late commercial payments
Draft mine freeHow it works
Name the engagement
Your business, your client, your jurisdiction — plus anything unusual about the deal.
Review clause by clause
GitLaw drafts the agreement and explains why each clause is in it — so you know what you're asking for and what you can trade.
Send and e-sign, free
Send it for signature with GitLaw's free e-sign, and keep the signed copy organised in your workspace.
Built for your legal work, with practicing lawyers
Trained on 5.5K+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.

Trusted by thousands of businesses
“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”
“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”
“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”
“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”
“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”
“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”
“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”
“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”
“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”
“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”
Greg Gretsch
Managing Director
“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”
Aleksandar Blazhev
Entrepreneur
“I found GitLaw to be extremely useful and convenient in helping draft a contract. It has tracking, an easy to understand and familiar interface and has saved thousands of dollars in fees.”
“I found GitLaw useful to review my medical contract. I was able to check differences from previous contract and tell me which parts are not standard.”
“Needed contracts for the brewery. Worked well, very timely, good comms. A+”
“GitLaw saves us hours when reviewing contracts. The AI suggestions are useful, and the platform is easy to adopt even for non-lawyers”
“GitLaw stands out because it combines AI with a practical legal workflow. It helped me understand contract terms much faster and made the review process much more efficient.”
“A thoughtfully designed legal AI platform. Whether you’re creating new agreements or reviewing existing ones, GitLaw makes the process smoother and easier to understand.”
“I needed this! I own a small business and I wrote all my contracts by myself from templates I saw online, later switched to chatGPT, but when I found gitlaw I was genuinely blown away by it. Great value for the price!!”
“I’ve used this to analyse a number of contracts recently, and my initial concerns were quickly allayed. It picked up on inconsistencies that would have taken me far longer to spot on my own”
“Super useful service! I’ve used it to review a few contracts and I really like how it explains and highlights parts of the documents to review more closely or question.”
“GitLaw is building an AI Legal Companion that's actually grounded in law.”
Greg Gretsch
Managing Director
“They save time, reduce cost, and make legal work more accessible. It's still early days for AI in law, but the progress is already impressive.”
Aleksandar Blazhev
Entrepreneur
“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”
“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”
“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”
“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”
“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”
“I love it!!”
“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”
“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”
“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”
Alex Cole
Founder, TIN Ventures
“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”
Mrinal Bhatt
HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo
“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”
Chris Hicken
Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid
“I used git.law to prepare my documents for the French prefecture and it made the whole process so much easier. Everything was clear and well organized and I felt confident submitting my file. Highly recommend!”
“Excellent! Really happy I found this. Easy to use and has saved me so much time”
“Really impressed with the user experience. GitLaw simplifies complex legal tasks without sacrificing quality. Highly recommended”
“One of the most practical AI legal tools I’ve tried. Clean interface, helpful features, and a team that’s clearly focused on solving real business problems”
“I’ve been impressed by GitLaw’s approach to contract management. The platform is easy to use, and the AI suggestions are practical and well thought out”
“I love it!!”
“Love the founder and this company. Very beneficial for startups like ours since we can review contracts and get stuff done easily and quicker.”
“The amount of time (and headaches) this saves is unreal. There’s an endless supply of templates to start from, and no futzing around with layout and formatting.”
“Love this! Huge opportunity to increase productivity and efficiency within SMEs who rely on regulatory compliance.”
Alex Cole
Founder, TIN Ventures
“Tried the AI chat and I must say, solid UX and impressive prompt interpretation. The multi-user collaboration workflow is a clear win for in-house teams. 👏”
Mrinal Bhatt
HR, People & Culture @ Peakflo
“This is so cool. I remember seeing the template library before, and pivoting to an AI agent that uses them as a foundation is genius.”
Chris Hicken
Co-Founder & CEO of TheySaid
Frequently asked questions
For most solo and smaller engagements, one combined services agreement is the consensus answer — simpler to negotiate and sign. The MSA + SOW split earns its keep when a client comes back repeatedly: agree the terms once, then a short statement of work per project. GitLaw starts you with the combined agreement and has the MSA + SOW pair ready for when the client grows.
Yes. A contract doesn't need a lawyer's letterhead to bind — it needs the essentials (parties, work, payment, signatures) and clauses that actually cover your risks. That second part is where generic templates fall short, and where a tailored draft you've reviewed clause by clause earns its keep.
The contested ones: scope (what's in and what's out), payment terms with a late-payment mechanism, IP ownership on payment, a liability cap, termination with notice, confidentiality, and a change-order route for scope creep. GitLaw includes each one and explains what it does for you.
US: there's no federal rate — a contractual late charge around 1.5% per month is the common norm, subject to state limits. UK: even if the contract said nothing, B2B invoices carry statutory interest at 8% over the Bank of England base rate plus fixed recovery sums (£40–£100 per invoice) under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 — GitLaw's UK agreement builds that right in expressly.
Not automatically, in either country. In the US, contractor work only counts as 'work made for hire' in nine narrow statutory categories and with a signed writing — most design, software and marketing work doesn't qualify, so client ownership needs an express assignment. In the UK, the author owns commissioned work by default (Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s.11). A clean assignment-on-payment clause protects both sides — and it's exactly what generic templates get wrong.
The UK consultancy variant is drafted with outside-IR35 markers (a substitution right, no mutuality of obligation, contractor control over the method), but status ultimately follows the working reality — and for medium and large clients it's the client who must determine it. Treat the contract as necessary but not sufficient, and take advice on borderline engagements.
A kill fee is a pre-agreed charge (typically 25–50% of the remaining fees) if the client cancels mid-project — it turns a dead project into paid time. Scope creep is handled by the change-order clause: new work needs a signed change order with its own fee, so 'quick extras' become billable decisions rather than favours.
Look like the bigger party at the table.
A tailored agreement, explained clause by clause, e-signed free — ready before your kickoff call.
