Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
7. Content Removal Policies - Submitting content removal requests
FfilmshakeUpdated 17 Oct 2025
This document provides a guide for users on how to submit content removal requests to a platform, covering copyrighted, trademarked, and private information. It outlines distinct reporting requirements for each category and advises users to review the relevant policies before submission. The guide also recommends consulting legal counsel if unsure about which policy applies.
Submitting content removal requests
This document is taken from the GitHub website - more information about GitHub and its functions can be found at https://github.com/. Please note that many of the included provisions are designed for GitHub or similar site (such as for building and developing software with online communities), so they are not relevant to all types of business.
You can amend this document to be suitable for your own Community and purposes using the smart fields and customizing the bracketed sections. We recommend adding hyperlinks to your own policies and website pages - make sure your business has in place all the policies referred to here.
We understand that copyrighted, trademarked, or private content may get published on [company name] – either accidentally or on purpose – sometimes in repositories that you do not own. Because the nature of this content varies, and because of different applicable laws, each category has its own, distinct reporting requirements outlined in our policies.
If you'd like to request that content be removed from our platform, please take some time to acquaint yourself with each of these policies and their respective reporting requirements before submitting a report. If we receive an incomplete report, we'll need to ask for clarifications or revisions and you’ll need to re-submit a revised report.
Please note that we're not able to help you determine which policy is appropriate for your specific situation. If you’ve reviewed the policies below and still have questions about whether or not content should be reported as copyright, trademark, or private information, we recommend consulting with independent legal counsel.
[DMCA Takedown Policy
The DMCA Takedown Policy can be used to report content that you believe infringes a copyright owned by you or your organization. Once you have reviewed the policy, you may also want to review our Guide to Submitting a DMCA Takedown Notice before submitting a report.]
[[company name] Trademark Policy
The [company name] Trademark Policy can be used to report content that appears to use your company or business name, logo, or other trademark-protected materials in a manner that may mislead or confuse others about brand or business affiliation.]
[[company name] Private Information Removal Policy
The [company name] Private Information Removal Policy can be used to report data that is private (confidential and poses a security risk), but that is not necessarily protected by copyright or trademark.
[Users in India can contact [company name]'s Grievance Officer.]
5.0 out of 5 on Google
Read reviewsAs seen in
United States note
This version is drafted for US law generally. Contract, employment and consumer rules vary by state — for example on non-competes and at-will employment. Tell GitLaw which state applies and it adjusts the draft.
Jurisdiction
United States of America
India
Document info
HTML document. Document created on Tue Jul 15th, 2025. Last updated on Fri Oct 17th, 2025.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
Report a Violation on Formulaic by Mozilla
This notice explains how users can report content policy violations on a digital platform and outlines the subsequent moderation and appeals process. It specifies the information required for a report, the potential penalties for publishers, and the six-month window for appealing a moderation decision.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedUS
Acceptable Use Policy by Mozilla
This policy defines prohibited activities for users of a company's digital services and products. It establishes clear boundaries against illegal acts, harassment, malware distribution, and intellectual property infringement while reserving the right to suspend users who violate these terms.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Content Removal Policies Github Trademark Policy (GitHub)
This policy outlines how a platform manages trademark disputes and reports of unauthorized brand use. It defines what constitutes a violation, provides an reporting procedure for rights holders, and specifies the information required to investigate infringement claims.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Request for Arbitration (LCIA Rules) by OLL
This document is a formal request to initiate arbitration under the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) rules. It enables a claimant to define the dispute, nominate arbitrators, and state the specific financial relief and legal declarations sought from the tribunal. The template includes required sections for party details, the factual background of the breach, and proof of registration fee payment.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Portugal
Confidentiality and Intellectual Property (IP) Agreement (Portugal) by Seedsummit
This agreement protects a company's confidential information and intellectual property created by an employee or consultant during their business relationship. It establishes that all developments, inventions, and proprietary data belong to the company and remains in effect after the relationship ends.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Letter to warn trader about court action for faulty goods by Citizens Advice
This letter serves as a formal notice before court action to a trader regarding faulty goods. It demands a full refund under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and sets a specific deadline for a response before county court proceedings are initiated.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Frequently asked questions
A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.
Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.
Yes, read about team plans here.
Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.
Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.
Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.
It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.
Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.
Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.
Trusted by 5,000+ businesses
From template to signed, in one place
Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.
1
Open
Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.
Free to open
2
Edit with AI
Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.
Tracked changes you can review
3
Send and sign
Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.
eSign included
Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers
Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.
Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
Juliana Calil
Principal Counsel · Technology & Entertainment
20+ years in-house at Google, Intel, Disney and Looker
Adam Wardel
General Counsel, Data Privacy Officer & AI Advisor
12+ years leading legal & privacy for SaaS and AI companies
John Hoffman
Associate Director, Corporate Counsel · Life Sciences & Technology
20+ years in corporate counsel, incl. senior counsel at Certara
Richard Nohe
General Counsel · Telecom, Cloud & Data Centers
20+ years in-house, regional General Counsel at BT across 30+ countries
Joe Al-Khayat
General Counsel · Technology & High-Growth Companies
Cross-jurisdictional M&A and SaaS contracting across the UK, US & Australia
Joshua Woo
Technology, AI & Privacy Counsel · APAC
Former Goldman Sachs Executive Director for AI, cybersecurity & privacy in APAC
Sahil Verma
International Business & Investment Lawyer
13+ years in business law, investment law & dispute resolution
Matthew Willis
CRO & General Counsel · SaaS
Former President of the ACC's 2,200-attorney Chicago Chapter · JD + Kellogg MBA
Mayowa Ogunrinola
Legal Consultant · Fintech & AI Compliance
Regulatory strategy, AI governance & data protection for fintech and AI
Steven J. Shanker
Partner and Chair of Corporate and Employment Law
25+ years as a corporate & employment attorney in New York
Rebecca Babbage
Legal Counsel · Financial Services, Corporate & Governance
UK-qualified solicitor working in-house with regulated entities in financial services
As seen in
Ready to get started?
No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.
GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.