Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
How We Handle Abusive Usage by Basecamp
BasecampUpdated 17 Oct 2025
This document outlines Basecamp's policy and process for handling abusive usage of its products. It details how potential abuse is discovered, investigated with human oversight and a focus on evidence, and the steps taken for resolution, including account termination or appeal options. The policy emphasizes protecting the privacy and safety of both customers and those reporting issues.
How we handle abusive usage
Last updated: January 19, 2021
We build our products* to give teams a better way to work. We are proud of that purpose and trust that our customers use our products for appropriate endeavors.
Sometimes, though, we discover potential abusive usage as detailed in our Use Restrictions policy. When that happens, we investigate using the following guiding principles and process.
*This process applies to any product created and owned by Basecamp, LLC. That includes Basecamp (any version), HEY, Highrise, Campfire, Backpack, Writeboard, and Ta-da List.
Guiding Principles
Human oversight
Who’s “we”, you ask? It’s us: folks from the Basecamp team. Our internal abuse oversight committee includes our executives, David and Jason, and representatives from multiple departments across the company. On rare occasions for particularly sensitive situations or if legally required, we may also seek counsel from external experts.
Balanced responsibilities
We have an obligation to protect the privacy and safety of both our customers and the people reporting issues to us. We do our best to balance those responsibilities throughout the process.
Focus on evidence
We base our decisions on the evidence available to us: what we see and hear account users say and do. We document what we observe and ask whether that observable evidence points to a restricted use.
Process
Every case goes through the same general process:
Discovery
Investigation
Decision, sometimes with right to an appeal
How do we discover potential abuse?
From our experience, we learn about potential abuse because:
Someone alerts us. We give abuse reports our full care and attention. Our Support team also responds to every question or comment that comes in. If we notice anything in those emails that points to a violation, we will look into it.
We notice an anomaly in our business operations monitoring. We monitor a range of things about our products, like signup volume and error rates of web requests. If we see something weird with those numbers, we get to the bottom of it.
We stumble upon public web content that links an individual or organization to a Basecamp product. We aren’t scouring the Internet looking for those links, but if we do come across any, we check them out.
This list is not exhaustive; there are always edge cases. We will update the list if we find regular new avenues.
How do we investigate?
We focus on the evidence:
Language and imagery used by users on the account
Evidence of account users’ power and/or ability to act on spoken claims
Publicly available information about account users
We strive to balance privacy and safety for all those involved:
We make every effort to complete our investigations without accessing a customer account. For instance, if there are screenshots or public documents available, we review those. We also consider whether it is appropriate to involve the account owner in a given investigation and seek additional evidence from them.
This is a preview. The full template is free on GitLaw.
Jurisdiction
Jurisdictions aren't set for this document
Document info
HTML document. Document created on Thu Sep 11th, 2025. Last updated on Fri Oct 17th, 2025.
This document is public
Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (Attribution).
Come to agreements faster
Write, review, negotiate, and manage legal contracts
Related documents
Acceptable Use Policies Github Appeal And Reinstatement (GitHub)
This policy establishes an internal process for users to request account reinstatement or appeal content moderation decisions. It allows users to submit additional information for up to six months after an enforcement action is taken.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Report a Violation on Formulaic by Mozilla
This notice explains how users can report content policy violations on a digital platform and outlines the subsequent moderation and appeals process. It specifies the information required for a report, the potential penalties for publishers, and the six-month window for appealing a moderation decision.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Content Removal Policies Github Trademark Policy (GitHub)
This policy outlines how a platform manages trademark disputes and reports of unauthorized brand use. It defines what constitutes a violation, provides an reporting procedure for rights holders, and specifies the information required to investigate infringement claims.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
US
Acceptable Use Policies Github Threats Of Violence And Gratuitously Violent Content (GitHub)
This policy prohibits users from using a platform to organize or promote acts of violence, including threats of physical harm, sexual violence, or death. It restricts the posting of graphic depictions of violence against humans or animals while providing exceptions for educational, documentary, or historical purposes provided clear warnings are included.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
FeaturedEngland & Wales
Letter to say you received goods or services you didn't ask for by Citizens Advice
This letter informs a company that you have received goods or services you did not order and treats them as unsolicited under UK law. It gives the sender a deadline to collect the items at their own expense before they are treated as your property.
Updated 13 Aug 2026
Frequently asked questions
A template isn't binding on its own - like any contract, it becomes binding once it's properly completed and signed. Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law; review any template before you sign it.
Yes. Chat with GitLaw to edit any section, or make changes directly in the editor.
Yes, read about team plans here.
Describe what you need in the chat and GitLaw will draft it for you.
Templates in our curated library are professionally drafted for US or UK law. The wider library comes from the GitLaw community and public sources - a solid starting point, but check any template fits your situation before you rely on it.
Mostly US and UK law. Some templates use general commercial terms that work across jurisdictions, and many note which law they're written for.
It depends on the situation. Templates work well for routine business agreements. For anything involving significant money, complex IP, employment, or areas you're unsure about, it's worth getting professional advice before you sign. GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice.
Open any template in GitLaw and describe the change you want in the chat — 'make clause 4 mutual' or 'add a 30-day notice period', for example. GitLaw drafts the revised language and shows it as a suggested edit. You accept, reject, or keep editing from there.
Yes. Upload a Word, PDF, or Markdown file and GitLaw will open it in the editor. You can review, edit, or chat with GitLaw about it the same way you would with any template from the library.
Trusted by 5,000+ businesses
From template to signed, in one place
Every template opens in an editor with an AI agent alongside it.
1
Open
Pick a template and open it. Nothing to download, and no credit card to start.
Free to open
2
Edit with AI
Describe your situation in chat and the agent adapts the wording, clause by clause.
Tracked changes you can review
3
Send and sign
Share it for negotiation, then collect signatures without leaving GitLaw.
eSign included
Built for your legal work,
with practicing lawyers
Trained on 5,500+ clauses and specialist areas of law. Built with a standards committee of independent lawyers.
Adam Frankel
General Counsel · Technology & AI
15+ years as General Counsel to technology, cloud & AI companies
Juliana Calil
Principal Counsel · Technology & Entertainment
20+ years in-house at Google, Intel, Disney and Looker
Adam Wardel
General Counsel, Data Privacy Officer & AI Advisor
12+ years leading legal & privacy for SaaS and AI companies
John Hoffman
Associate Director, Corporate Counsel · Life Sciences & Technology
20+ years in corporate counsel, incl. senior counsel at Certara
Richard Nohe
General Counsel · Telecom, Cloud & Data Centers
20+ years in-house, regional General Counsel at BT across 30+ countries
Joe Al-Khayat
General Counsel · Technology & High-Growth Companies
Cross-jurisdictional M&A and SaaS contracting across the UK, US & Australia
Joshua Woo
Technology, AI & Privacy Counsel · APAC
Former Goldman Sachs Executive Director for AI, cybersecurity & privacy in APAC
Sahil Verma
International Business & Investment Lawyer
13+ years in business law, investment law & dispute resolution
Matthew Willis
CRO & General Counsel · SaaS
Former President of the ACC's 2,200-attorney Chicago Chapter · JD + Kellogg MBA
Mayowa Ogunrinola
Legal Consultant · Fintech & AI Compliance
Regulatory strategy, AI governance & data protection for fintech and AI
Steven J. Shanker
Partner and Chair of Corporate and Employment Law
25+ years as a corporate & employment attorney in New York
Rebecca Babbage
Legal Counsel · Financial Services, Corporate & Governance
UK-qualified solicitor working in-house with regulated entities in financial services
Ready to get started?
No sales calls, no credit card. Just chat with GitLaw.
GitLaw provides templates and tools, not legal advice. Templates are a starting point, not a substitute for advice on your situation - for anything significant, speak to a qualified lawyer.